mbre 2014 09:01
> *À :* Igor Potjevlesch
> *Cc :* 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
> *Objet :* Re: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> the patch you pasted doesn't seem to be to nathelper module. Be sure
> you ge
edi 3 décembre 2014 09:01
À : Igor Potjevlesch
Cc : 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy
Hello,
the patch you pasted doesn't seem to be to nathelper module. Be sure you get
the one from core as well.
Cheers, Da
@gmail.com]
> *Envoyé :* mardi 2 décembre 2014 09:54
> *À :* Igor Potjevlesch
> *Cc :* 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
> *Objet :* Re: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> did you update to latest version in the
mardi 2 décembre 2014 09:54
À : Igor Potjevlesch
Cc : 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy
Hello,
did you update to latest version in the branch or you applied the patches?
If first option, then give me the out
or.
>
>
>
> *De :*Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com]
> *Envoyé :* lundi 1 décembre 2014 12:00
> *À :* Igor Potjevlesch
> *Cc :* 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
> *Objet :* Re: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy
>
&g
2014 12:00
À : Igor Potjevlesch
Cc : 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy
Hello,
didn't get the time to look at the INVITE trace before, checked it now and
indeed, there was an issue revealed by t
ng with the SIP message?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Igor.
>
>
>
> *De :*Igor Potjevlesch [mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com]
> *Envoyé :* lundi 24 novembre 2014 19:43
> *À :* 'Daniel-Constantin Mierla'
> *Cc :* 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mail
gmail.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 novembre 2014 12:29
À : 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Objet : RE: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy
Hello,
I reviewed the changelogs.
I can see the following updates that could change the previous behaviour:
le...@gmail.com>
mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 novembre 2014 12:29
À : 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Objet : RE: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy
Hello,
I reviewed the changelogs.
I can see the following up
that I tried also with 4.2.1 and the issue is the
> same.
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Igor.
>
>
>
> *De :*Igor Potjevlesch [mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com]
> *Envoyé :* jeudi 20 novembre 2014 17:00
> *À :* 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
> *
(SER) - Users Mailing List'
Objet : RE: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy
Hello,
I reviewed the changelogs.
I can see the following updates that could change the previous behaviour:
commit 42897d422b60edeac393201326a3e71318445e62
Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierl
sers-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] De la part de Amit Patkar
Envoyé : mardi 18 novembre 2014 13:16
À : sr-users@lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy
Hi
You should compare this line in your configu
otjevlesch [mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mardi 18 novembre 2014 14:00
À : a...@avhan.com; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Objet : RE: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy
Hi Amit,
The config is the same between the two version. Even th
: Re: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy
Hi
You should compare this line in your configuration file.
if (nat_uac_test("18")) {
It may be using different parameters.
Regards,
Amit
On 11/18/2014 5:23 PM, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
Hello,
I can rep
Hi
You should compare this line in your configuration file.
if (nat_uac_test("*18*")) {
It may be using different parameters.
*Regards,*
Amit
On 11/18/2014 5:23 PM, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
Hello,
I can reproduce the issue on a pre-production system.
So, I downgraded to 4.1.5.
Here is t
Hello,
I can reproduce the issue on a pre-production system.
So, I downgraded to 4.1.5.
Here is the difference:
The INVITE comes into NATDETECT:
route[NATDETECT] {
xlog("ENTERING NATDETECT routes\n");
#!ifdef WITH_NAT
force_rport();
if (nat_uac_test("18"))
16 matches
Mail list logo
