Hello, the commits you refer to were not related to nat_uac_test() function.
Can you send the sip message for which you used the test and is different than in the old versions? Cheers, Daniel On 21/11/14 11:16, Igor Potjevlesch wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Just to let you know that I tried also with 4.2.1 and the issue is the > same. > > Regards, > > > > Igor. > > > > *De :*Igor Potjevlesch [mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com] > *Envoyé :* jeudi 20 novembre 2014 17:00 > *À :* 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List' > *Objet :* RE: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy > > > > Hello, > > > > No one has experienced the same issue or similar until 4.2.0? > > Regards, > > > > Igor. > > > > *De :*Igor Potjevlesch [mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com] > *Envoyé :* mercredi 19 novembre 2014 12:29 > *À :* 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List' > *Objet :* RE: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy > > > > Hello, > > > > I reviewed the changelogs. > > I can see the following updates that could change the previous behaviour: > > > > commit 42897d422b60edeac393201326a3e71318445e62 > > Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com > <mailto:mico...@gmail.com>> > > Date: Mon Sep 22 22:04:39 2014 +0200 > > > > core: add received parameter to via if rport parameter is present > > > > - required by RFC3581, section 4. > > > > (cherry picked from commit a1e96cbd5a3b43598c59cb50693e6b739801b804) > > > > commit a52c0024723a59d90c3c3966d5deadaf8b0d4440 > > Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com > <mailto:mico...@gmail.com>> > > Date: Sun Sep 28 12:48:53 2014 +0200 > > > > core: helper functions to get addr and port to be used in > signaling from socket info > > (cherry picked from commit c725f1dec14863e069bfd1e5c26857a1005528d5) > > > > But I can't explain why the same nat_uac_test doesn't behaves the same > between the two versions. > > > > Regards, > > > > Igor. > > > > *De :*Igor Potjevlesch [mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com] > *Envoyé :* mardi 18 novembre 2014 14:00 > *À :* a...@avhan.com <mailto:a...@avhan.com>; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users > Mailing List' > *Objet :* RE: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy > > > > Hi Amit, > > > > The config is the same between the two version. Even this line. > > > > Regards, > > > > Igor. > > > > *De :*sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org > <mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org> > [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *De la part de* Amit Patkar > *Envoyé :* mardi 18 novembre 2014 13:16 > *À :* sr-users@lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> > *Objet :* Re: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy > > > > Hi > > You should compare this line in your configuration file. > > if (nat_uac_test("*18*")) { > > It may be using different parameters. > > *Regards,* > > Amit > > > > > On 11/18/2014 5:23 PM, Igor Potjevlesch wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I can reproduce the issue on a pre-production system. > > So, I downgraded to 4.1.5. > > > > Here is the difference: > > The INVITE comes into NATDETECT: > > > > route[NATDETECT] { > > xlog("ENTERING NATDETECT routes\n"); > > #!ifdef WITH_NAT > > force_rport(); > > if (nat_uac_test("18")) { > > if (is_method("REGISTER")) { > > fix_nated_register(); > > } else { > > add_contact_alias(); > > } > > setflag(FLT_NATS); > > xlog("NAT_UAC_TEST OK\n"); > > } > > #!endif > > return; > > } > > > > With Kamailio 4.2.0, the NAT_UAC_TEST returns true whereas with > 4.1.5 returns false. > > > > I also look at the “force_rport”. I’m not sure if it’s related, > but with 4.2.0, the Via looks like: > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > > PST_GW:5060;received=PST_GW;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK-34d5-1416308856-4847-441\r\n > > > > In 4.1.5: > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > PST_GW:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK-2e3d-1416311184-4886-146\r\n > > > > The received parameters is not added. Note that PSTN_GW refers to > a public IP address (out of RFC1918 and Carrier Grade NAT). > > > > Regards, > > > > Igor. > > > > *De :*Igor Potjevlesch [mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com] > *Envoyé :* mardi 18 novembre 2014 11:43 > *À :* sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > <mailto:us...@lists.sip-router.org> > *Objet :* Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy > > > > Hello, > > > > Since I done the upgrade of Kamailio into 4.2.0, there are, at > least, one new case where the RTPProxy is launched. > > > > When I got an INVITE from my PSTN Gateway, for unknown reason (and > not for all calls), Record-Route is append with nat=yes. I looked > into an old trace and this behaviour didn’t exist. > > > > What could have changed that can explain this? > > > > Regards, > > > > Igor. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> > > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
