Hello, did you update to latest version in the branch or you applied the patches?
If first option, then give me the output of 'kamailio -v'. If second, can you send the patch that resulted for you, because there were two commits? Cheers, Daniel On 02/12/14 08:46, Igor Potjevlesch wrote: > > Hello Daniel, > > > Thank you for the patch. > > > > I tried it (change received_test() by received_via_test()), but the > result is the same. > > The INVITE was the same than the one already sent. > > > > Regards, > > > > Igor. > > > > *De :*Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com] > *Envoyé :* lundi 1 décembre 2014 12:00 > *À :* Igor Potjevlesch > *Cc :* 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List' > *Objet :* Re: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy > > > > Hello, > > didn't get the time to look at the INVITE trace before, checked it now > and indeed, there was an issue revealed by the extension of > received_test() function to check the presence of rport parameter. The > issue was there with the presence of received parameter in Via, but > that was not common and thus this testing function was ok for most of > the case. > > I just pushed patches to fix it in master, 4.2 and 4.1 branches. Let > me know if works as expected now. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 27/11/14 19:30, Igor Potjevlesch wrote: > > Hello Daniel, > > > > Did you see something with the SIP message? > > > > Regards, > > > > Igor. > > > > *De :*Igor Potjevlesch [mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com] > *Envoyé :* lundi 24 novembre 2014 19:43 > *À :* 'Daniel-Constantin Mierla' > *Cc :* 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List' > *Objet :* RE: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or > rtpproxy > > > > Hello Daniel, > > > > Here is the SIP message: > > […] > > > > I can confirm that the issue is present with 4.2.1 too. > > No problem with 4.1.4. > > > > The SIP message and the configuration are the same in both cases. > > > > Thank you. > > Regards, > > > > Igor. > > > > *De :*sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org > > <mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org>[mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org > <mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org>] *De la part de* > Daniel-Constantin Mierla > *Envoyé :* vendredi 21 novembre 2014 11:59 > *À :* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > *Objet :* Re: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or > rtpproxy > > > > Hello, > > the commits you refer to were not related to nat_uac_test() function. > > Can you send the sip message for which you used the test and is > different than in the old versions? > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 21/11/14 11:16, Igor Potjevlesch wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Just to let you know that I tried also with 4.2.1 and the > issue is the same. > > Regards, > > > > Igor. > > > > *De :*Igor Potjevlesch [mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com] > *Envoyé :* jeudi 20 novembre 2014 17:00 > *À :* 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List' > *Objet :* RE: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or > rtpproxy > > > > Hello, > > > > No one has experienced the same issue or similar until 4.2.0? > > Regards, > > > > Igor. > > > > *De :*Igor Potjevlesch [mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com] > *Envoyé :* mercredi 19 novembre 2014 12:29 > *À :* 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List' > *Objet :* RE: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or > rtpproxy > > > > Hello, > > > > I reviewed the changelogs. > > I can see the following updates that could change the previous > behaviour: > > > > commit 42897d422b60edeac393201326a3e71318445e62 > > Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com > <mailto:mico...@gmail.com>> > > Date: Mon Sep 22 22:04:39 2014 +0200 > > > > core: add received parameter to via if rport parameter is > present > > > > - required by RFC3581, section 4. > > > > (cherry picked from commit > a1e96cbd5a3b43598c59cb50693e6b739801b804) > > > > commit a52c0024723a59d90c3c3966d5deadaf8b0d4440 > > Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com > <mailto:mico...@gmail.com>> > > Date: Sun Sep 28 12:48:53 2014 +0200 > > > > core: helper functions to get addr and port to be used in > signaling from socket info > > (cherry picked from commit > c725f1dec14863e069bfd1e5c26857a1005528d5) > > > > But I can't explain why the same nat_uac_test doesn't behaves > the same between the two versions. > > > > Regards, > > > > Igor. > > > > *De :*Igor Potjevlesch [mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com] > *Envoyé :* mardi 18 novembre 2014 14:00 > *À :* a...@avhan.com <mailto:a...@avhan.com>; 'Kamailio (SER) > - Users Mailing List' > *Objet :* RE: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or > rtpproxy > > > > Hi Amit, > > > > The config is the same between the two version. Even this line. > > > > Regards, > > > > Igor. > > > > *De :* sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org > <mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org> > [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *De la part de* > Amit Patkar > *Envoyé :* mardi 18 novembre 2014 13:16 > *À :* sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> > *Objet :* Re: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or > rtpproxy > > > > Hi > > You should compare this line in your configuration file. > > if (nat_uac_test("*18*")) { > > It may be using different parameters. > > *Regards,* > > Amit > > > > > On 11/18/2014 5:23 PM, Igor Potjevlesch wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I can reproduce the issue on a pre-production system. > > So, I downgraded to 4.1.5. > > > > Here is the difference: > > The INVITE comes into NATDETECT: > > > > route[NATDETECT] { > > xlog("ENTERING NATDETECT routes\n"); > > #!ifdef WITH_NAT > > force_rport(); > > if (nat_uac_test("18")) { > > if (is_method("REGISTER")) { > > fix_nated_register(); > > } else { > > add_contact_alias(); > > } > > setflag(FLT_NATS); > > xlog("NAT_UAC_TEST OK\n"); > > } > > #!endif > > return; > > } > > > > With Kamailio 4.2.0, the NAT_UAC_TEST returns true whereas > with 4.1.5 returns false. > > > > I also look at the “force_rport”. I’m not sure if it’s > related, but with 4.2.0, the Via looks like: > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > > PST_GW:5060;received=PST_GW;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK-34d5-1416308856-4847-441\r\n > > > > In 4.1.5: > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > PST_GW:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK-2e3d-1416311184-4886-146\r\n > > > > The received parameters is not added. Note that PSTN_GW > refers to a public IP address (out of RFC1918 and Carrier > Grade NAT). > > > > Regards, > > > > Igor. > > > > *De :*Igor Potjevlesch [mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com] > *Envoyé :* mardi 18 novembre 2014 11:43 > *À :* sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > <mailto:us...@lists.sip-router.org> > *Objet :* Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy > > > > Hello, > > > > Since I done the upgrade of Kamailio into 4.2.0, there > are, at least, one new case where the RTPProxy is launched. > > > > When I got an INVITE from my PSTN Gateway, for unknown > reason (and not for all calls), Record-Route is append > with nat=yes. I looked into an old trace and this > behaviour didn’t exist. > > > > What could have changed that can explain this? > > > > Regards, > > > > Igor. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users > mailing list > > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> > > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing > list > > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> > > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > > -- > > Daniel-Constantin Mierla > > http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> - > http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > > > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla > http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> - > http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
