Support the adoption and this is an important work for interop between MPLS and
SRv6 and useful in production environments.
Regards,
Gaurav
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 11, 2024, at 6:28 AM, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Dear WG:
>
> This message starts a three-week adoption call fo
Unaware of any IPR.
Gaurav
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 16, 2024, at 8:04 PM, Gaurav Dawra wrote:
>
>
> Support the adoption and this is an important work for interop between MPLS
> and SRv6 and useful in production environments.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gaurav
>
&
Support
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 19, 2019, at 8:54 AM, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
>
>
> Hi SPRING WG,
>
> This begins a 2 week Early Allocation call for a “Ethernet” value from the
> "Protocol Numbers" registry.
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programm
+1
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 26, 2020, at 9:43 AM, Zafar Ali (zali)
> wrote:
>
>
> +1,
>
> Just to add, in the spirit of IETF https://www.ietf.org/how/runningcode/ …
> implementation, commercial deployment and Inter-op status has been documented
> in
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc
Support
Gaurav
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 22, 2020, at 7:46 AM, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Hi SPRING WG,
>
> Authors of draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment [1] have asked for WG
> adoption.
>
> Please indicate your support, comments, or objection, for adopting this draft
Support
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 13, 2020, at 8:38 AM, James Guichard
> wrote:
>
>
> Dear WG:
>
> This email begins a 2 week WG adoption call for
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-raza-spring-sr-policy-yang/ ending
> Monday 27th July 2020.
>
> Please speak up if you support
+1 - I agree with Dirk and others.
The industry has been working on SRv6 for multiple years with technology being
quite mature.
The requirements listed in the appendix are fully justified from a technical
and deployment point of view.
I support the requirements based on the SRv6 control plan
+1 on Jorge and Robert. I don’t think we should mandate.
Gaurav
> On Jul 19, 2021, at 6:52 AM, Robert Raszuk wrote:
>
>
> I agree with Jorge..
>
> In fact I find the tone of the comment to be very inappropriate:
>
> > In case of best effort/flex algo we must mandate user to set correspond
Support adoption of both documents.
Gaurav
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 6:13 AM wrote:
> Dear WG,
>
>
>
>
>
> The Design Team has produced two documents:
>
> - A requirement document: draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement
>
> - A solution analysis document: draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-a
Dear WG and Chairs,
With multiple vendor implementations and interops. The draft is for SRv6
compression based on the single SRv6 data plane
I strongly support its adoption
Gaurav
Linkedin
> On Oct 10, 2021, at 10:48 PM, Keyur Patel wrote:
>
> Dear WG and the WG Chairs,
>
> Network progra
Thanks Beniot for the comments.
Please see inline [Gaurav]
> On Jan 11, 2018, at 1:30 AM, Benoit Claise wrote:
>
> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and
Adam,
Thanks for the comments. Inline…[Gaurav]
> On Jan 10, 2018, at 8:01 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
>
> Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> ema
Tina,
I am adding Pablo. He will respond to below comment.
Cheers,
Gaurav
> On Feb 6, 2018, at 7:33 AM, Tina Tsou wrote:
>
> Dear Gaurav,
>
> Please scroll down to see the reply in line.
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:54 AM Gaurav Dawra <mailto:gdawra.i...@gmail.com&
Hey Martin,
Sorry for late reply. Please see some comments inline[Gaurav]
> On Jan 9, 2018, at 2:25 PM, Martin Stiemerling wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've reviewed this document as part of the transport area review team's
> ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
Hi Folks,
Friendly reminder on the feedback.
Cheers,
Gaurav
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 14, 2018, at 8:47 PM, Gaurav Dawra wrote:
>
> Hey Martin,
>
> Sorry for late reply. Please see some comments inline[Gaurav]
>
>> On Jan 9, 2018, at 2:25 PM, Martin Stiemerli
Welcome Rob!
Thanks Martin for your help! Looking forward in new role :)
Cheers,
Gaurav
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 21, 2018, at 4:40 AM, Alvaro Retana wrote:
>
> Dear spring WG:
>
> As all of you already know, Martin has been selected as a Routing AD starting
> next month at IETF 101 in
,
Gaurav
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 8:47 PM, Gaurav Dawra wrote:
> Hey Martin,
>
> Sorry for late reply. Please see some comments inline[Gaurav]
>
> On Jan 9, 2018, at 2:25 PM, Martin Stiemerling wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've reviewed this document as part of
Hi, Martin,
Friendly Reminder for your feedback to close this review.
Cheers,
Gaurav
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Gaurav Dawra wrote:
> Hey Martin,
>
> Seeking your feedback here. Regarding Section 7.1, The intent of the
> document is to describe one suggestive way and do no
proposals in pipeline. Effort from this WG will be needed
to optimally standardize these extensions.
Cheers,
Gaurav Dawra
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 18, 2018, at 12:05 AM, Voyer, Daniel wrote:
>
> I have to echo Paul’s comments and add the following:
>
> 1. So far, we haven’t wor
+ Alvaro’s right email id
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 18, 2018, at 2:18 AM, Gaurav Dawra wrote:
>
> I echo Paul and Daniel’s comments and add following:
>
> .SR-TE is an critical piece of technology to do Traffic Engineering and
> optimal steering and utilization of r
+1. SR-Policy is part of SPRING Charter.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 21, 2018, at 1:45 AM, Kamran Raza (skraza) wrote:
>
> +1
>
> I also believe that SR-policy falls under the charter of SPRING WG and not
> TEAS.
> Thx
> --
> Kamran
>
> From: spring on behalf of Robert Raszuk
>
> Date:
Spring Chairs,
Speaking as SPRING Member who is operator and not a co-author.
I support adoption of this document as WG document.
Cheers
Gaurav
Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> From: spring on behalf of Rob Shakir
>
> Date: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 11:21 AM
> To: SPRING WG List
> Subject: [
"elephant flow" problem in the data-center and
avoiding link imbalances.
Cheers,
Gaurav
> On Apr 9, 2018, at 8:02 AM, Martin Stiemerling wrote:
>
> Hi Gaurav,
>
> Am 01.03.18 um 16:01 schrieb Gaurav Dawra:
>> Hey Martin,
>> Seeking your feedback here. Reg
got lost on my end, sorry for this. The filter just moved these messages
> out of my sight... :-/
>
> Am 15.02.18 um 05:47 schrieb Gaurav Dawra:
>> Hey Martin,
>> Sorry for late reply. Please see some comments inline[Gaurav]
>>> On Jan 9, 2018, at 2:25 PM, Martin Stie
On Apr 9, 2018, at 7:58 AM, Martin Stiemerling <mailto:mls.i...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Gaurav,
>
> This got lost on my end, sorry for this. The filter just moved these messages
> out of my sight... :-/
>
> Am 15.02.18 um 05:47 schrieb Gaurav Dawra:
>> Hey
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the review. Any further comments here ? I will post the new version
soon.
Cheers,
Gaurav
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 16, 2018, at 7:44 PM, Gaurav Dawra wrote:
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> Apologies from my end we had few internal authors conversations on th
Hi Martin,
Thanks for review. I will post the new version. Hopefully, it will address all
your comments and we can close this review.
Any updates on below response?
Cheers,
Gaurav
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 23, 2018, at 4:17 AM, Gaurav Dawra wrote:
>
> Hi Martin,
>
>
gt;> Hi!! How are you?
> > br/>> Gaurav just posted a revision. Please takke a look and let us
> know if br/>> the changes address your concerrns or not.
> > br/>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff??url2=draft-ietf-spring-
> segment-routing-msdc-09
> &
Hi Alvaro, Mirja
Any feedback or next steps to close this?
Cheers,
Gaurav
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 12, 2018, at 7:06 AM, Gaurav Dawra wrote:
>
> Hi Mirja,
>
> Friendly Reminder...Could you please also advice if there is anything further
> to DISCUSS on this docum
Hey Alvaro, Mirja,
Friendly reminder to further progress this document.
Cheers,
Gaurav
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Gaurav Dawra wrote:
> Hi Alvaro, Mirja
>
> Any feedback or next steps to close this?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Gaurav
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On
ight go
> away or become unusable, it's best to use Multipath TCP (with coupled
> congestion control) instead because that works on the right time scale.
> Again, I don't think this is a use case for SR and I would recommend to
> remove the section entirely.
>
> Mirj
case for SR and I would recommend to
remove the section entirely.
Mirja
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:08 PM, Gaurav Dawra
wrote:
> Hi Mirja,
>
> Ack. Let me work with authors to close ASAP.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Gaurav
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jul 5, 2018, at 10:0
Hi Mirja,
Any update ?
Cheers,
Gaurav
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 3, 2018, at 10:50 AM, Gaurav Dawra wrote:
>
> Hey Mirja,
>
> Sorry for the long delay. I was traveling constantly since IETF and bit lost
> in my mailbox and discussion with Authors. Please see my
Hi Mirja,
Please see inline...[Gaurav2]
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 8:30 AM Mirja Kühlewind wrote:
> Hi Gaurav,
>
> please see inline.
>
> On 03.08.2018 07:20, Gaurav Dawra wrote:
>
> Hey Mirja,
>
> Sorry for the long delay. I was traveling constantly since IETF and b
Hi MIrja,
I have posted a new version. Please do let me know if we need to discuss
further. We can do it over the phone.
Cheers,
Gaurav
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 4:29 AM Gaurav Dawra wrote:
> Hi Mirja,
>
> Please see inline...[Gaurav2]
>
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 8:30 AM
documents. Why is that not an option for the authors? Why do you
> think that section 7 is important for this document?
>
> Mirja
>
>
>> On 16.10.18 07:45, Gaurav Dawra wrote:
>> Hi MIrja,
>>
>> I have posted a new version. Please do let me know if we need
Thanks Alvaro.
Mirja,
How does this text sound? I am inclined to the discussion over the phone if
we need further discussion :)
"This section outlines as an example a possible solution for addressing
flow steering problem using SR. The host which is originating an flow may
share its application
IMHO, and OAM is covered in 8403. Am I missing
> something?
>
> If not, please do seriously consider (as the author group) removing this
> section, or simply linking to the other documents with brief statements on
> the underlying points.
>
> Kind regards,
> r.
>
>
t.
>
> Cheers,
> r.
>
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 11:00 AM Gaurav Dawra wrote:
>> Rob -
>>
>> After some discussions with authors - I will remove Sec. 7. Hopefully, this
>> will close out this informational doc.
>>
>> Will post a new version.
+1
Gaurav Dawra
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 28, 2019, at 6:11 AM, Bernier, Daniel wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Dan B
>
> On 2019-02-26, 4:20 PM, "spring on behalf of Adrian Farrel"
> wrote:
>
>This draft has been around the block a bit, but certainly
Support.
Gaurav
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 13, 2019, at 1:23 PM, Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
> wrote:
>
> Support.
>
> Regards,
> Nagendra
>
> On 3/13/19, 3:31 PM, "spring on behalf of IETF Secretariat"
> wrote:
>
>
>The SPRING WG has placed draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-networ
Support
Gaurav
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 13, 2019, at 1:35 PM, Paul Mattes
> wrote:
>
> Support.
>
> pdm
>
> From: spring On Behalf Of bruno.decra...@orange.com
> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 11:50 AM
> To: SPRING WG
> Cc: draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programm...@iet
Support
Gaurav
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 27, 2019, at 7:50 PM, Chengli (Cheng Li) wrote:
>
> Yes, support as a co-author.
>
> This draft has been updated several revision, and the content is stable for
> WG adoption.
>
> Cheng
>
>
> From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On
Hi
Not aware of any IPR.
Gaurav
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 26, 2019, at 11:13 PM, Rob Shakir wrote:
>
> Hi Authors, SPRING WG,
>
> In parallel to the call for working group adoption for
> draft-xuclad-spring-sr-service-programming we would like to poll for IPR.
>
> If you are aware of IP
Rob,
I am not aware of any IPR than what already disclosed.
Gaurav
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
>
> Rob,
>
> I’m not aware of any IPR besides that already disclosed.
>
> Regards,
> Jeff
>
>> On Aug 4, 2019, at 15:12, Rob Shakir
>> wrote:
>>
>> S
Hi,
We are interested in the SRv6 solution as standardized by the working group.
Thanks!
We see SRv6 solution may align with some of our production requirements for
TE(and other use-cases) while potentially being inline within our needs for
simplicity, performance, MTU overhead optimizations et
+1
Agree.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 18, 2019, at 5:32 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Thu, 19 Sep 2019, 09:40 Dirk Steinberg, wrote:
>> SRv6 does not require TLV processing for normal forwarding (use case: SP
>> core).
>
>
> +1
>
> The Internet scales because complexity is pushed t
Support.
Regards,
-Gaurav
From: spring mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org>> on
behalf of Robert Raszuk mailto:rob...@raszuk.net>>
Date: Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 4:39 AM
To: Susan Hares mailto:sha...@ndzh.com>>
Cc: idr wg mailto:i...@ietf.org>>,
"spring@ietf.org"
mail
+1
Support the publication of this draft.
Regards,
Gaurav
On 7/10/17, 7:12 AM, "spring on behalf of stefano previdi"
wrote:
I strongly support the publication of this draft.
I’m not aware of any IPR related to the mechanisms described in the draft.
s.
>
Hey Alavaro, Bruno,
Sorry for the long delay.
The authors are working on the different reviews and will address all comments
before next meeting.
Regards,
Gaurav
From: spring on behalf of "Alvaro Retana (aretana)"
Date: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 9:35 PM
To: "draft-ietf-spring-segment-r
Hey Alavaro,
Thank you so much for the review.
Pls see inline..
From: spring on behalf of "Alvaro Retana (aretana)"
Date: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 9:35 PM
To: "draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-...@ietf.org"
Cc: Bruno Decraene , "spring@ietf.org"
, "spring-cha...@ietf.org"
Su
Hey Alvaro,
A new version of the draft has been published addressing your comments. Please
see an update for rest of the comments inline….
Thanks again so much for your review.
Regards,
Gaurav
From: Gaurav Dawra
Date: Thursday, October 12, 2017 at 5:57 PM
To: "draft-ietf-spring-se
Hi Bruno,
Thanks. I don’t know of any IPR beyond what has already been disclosed.
Cheers,
Gaurav
From: Bruno Decraene
Date: Monday, October 30, 2017 at 10:47 AM
To: Gaurav Dawra
Cc: "spring@ietf.org" , "spring-cha...@ietf.org"
,
"draft-ietf-spring-segment-rou
Hey Alvaro,
Thanks a lot again for your review. Have posted the next version. Please see
response inline .
Regards,
Gaurav
From: Alvaro Retana
Date: Friday, November 3, 2017 at 7:33 AM
To: Gaurav Dawra ,
"draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-...@ietf.org"
Cc: "
Hey Andrew,
Thanks a lot for your review. Addressed the minor comments in the latest
revision.
Cheers,
Gaurav
From: "Andrew G. Malis"
Date: Thursday, December 7, 2017 at 4:05 PM
To: ""
Cc: "rtg-...@ietf.org" ,
"draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe@ietf.org"
, "spring@ietf.org"
Hey Ben,
Thanks a lot for your review. Many thanks and much appreciated!
Please see inline .
Regards,
Gaurav
On 12/13/17, 8:00 PM, "Ben Campbell" wrote:
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-07: No Objection
Hey Bruno,
Thanks for the review. Please see inline [Gaurav_2]
Regards,
Gaurav
From: Bruno Decraene
Date: Thursday, December 21, 2017 at 3:06 AM
To: Gaurav Dawra , Alvaro Retana
Cc: "spring@ietf.org" , "spring-cha...@ietf.org"
,
"draft-ietf-spring-segment-rou
Hey Bruno,
ACK. Will update in the next revision.
Cheers,
Gaurav
On 12/21/17, 6:05 AM, "spring on behalf of bruno.decra...@orange.com"
wrote:
Hi authors,
Thanks for the updated draft and having updated draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3107bis
with RFC 8277 in section 4.2 "eBGP"
Could yo
Alvaro,
Done! Thanks.
Cheers,
Gaurav
From: Alvaro Retana
Date: Thursday, December 21, 2017 at 7:19 AM
To: Gaurav Dawra , Bruno Decraene
Cc: "draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-...@ietf.org"
,
"spring-cha...@ietf.org" , "spring@ietf.org"
Subject: RE
Hey Bruno,
I have submitted a new version with this change.
Cheers,
Gaurav
On 12/21/17, 6:05 AM, "spring on behalf of bruno.decra...@orange.com"
wrote:
Hi authors,
Thanks for the updated draft and having updated
draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3107bis with RFC 8277 in
60 matches
Mail list logo
