Alvaro, Done! Thanks.
Cheers, Gaurav From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.i...@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, December 21, 2017 at 7:19 AM To: Gaurav Dawra <gda...@cisco.com>, Bruno Decraene <bruno.decra...@orange.com> Cc: "draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-...@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-...@ietf.org>, "spring-cha...@ietf.org" <spring-cha...@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-06 On December 21, 2017 at 9:39:49 AM, bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com> (bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>) wrote: I see that you have also added the “note” on for the VPN routes. I don’t think it’s necessary here as: - if both routes are VPN ones, they are both labelled and are comparable as per regular BGP/MPLS IP VPN routes - if only the “policy” route is installed in the VRF (VRF fallback to the main FIB), only the labeled VPN routes is considered, hence preferred. Bottom line, I think that the note can be removed in the VPN section (5.4). But nothing urgent, this can wait for a next update. Hi! I’m waiting for that next update to approve publication… Alvaro.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
