Re: [spring] IPR call and Shepherding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression

Hi All, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR relevant to this draft. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) > -Original Message- > From: spring On Behalf Of Joel Halpern > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 17:36 > To: SPRING WG List > Subject: [spring] IPR call and Shepherding draft-ietf-sprin

Re: [spring] More Discussion//RE: Re:Re: [Teas] New term for the underlay construct used for slice realization

flows. As for the relationship between network resource group and TE, perhaps it could be discussed further along with the progress and discussion of draft-3272bis. Please let us know if you have any thoughts about this, many thanks. Best regards, Robin From: Lizhenbin Sent: Friday, August

Re: [spring] Conclusion from WG poll on dataplane solution for compressing segment routing over IPv6

Hi Chairs, Many thanks for your hard work for progressing the SRv6 compression work! After several round polls in WG, we believe that we have reached the consensus that CSID draft should be adopted as a WG document. In addition, the CSID co-authors have explained clearly that the CSID is one da

Re: [spring] WG Adoption call - draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement - draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-analysis

Hi All, I support the adoption of these drafts. Thanks very much to the DT’s hard work. Best Regards, Robin 发件人: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 bruno.decra...@orange.com 发送时间: 2021年9月7日 21:13 收件人: spring@ietf.org 主题: [spring]

[spring] More Discussion//RE: Re:Re: [Teas] New term for the underlay construct used for slice realization

Regards, Robin From: Lizhenbin Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 10:29 PM To: '龚立艳' ; draft-ali-teas-sprin ; draft-filsfils-sprin ; draft-decraene-mpls- Cc: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; spring@ietf.org; m...@ietf.org; TEAS WG ; EXT-vishnupavan@gmai ; Adrian Farrel ; Tarek Saad Subject: RE: Re

Re: [spring] [Teas] New term for the underlay construct used for slicerealization

Hi Liyan, Sorry that I missed your new draft. Thanks for your feedback. It is helpful for us to have a common terminology. Best Regards, Robin From: 龚立艳 [mailto:gongli...@chinamobile.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 4:48 PM To: Lizhenbin ; draft-ali-teas-sprin ; draft-filsfils-sprin

Re: [spring] [Teas] New term for the underlay construct used for slice realization

t do that, for example, with a set of parallel links that can be aggregated (or bundled) and treated as a single link. I don't think we are aggregating resources in this case. We are grouping, profiling, partitioning, collecting, or even filtering. Adrian From: Tarek Saad mailto:tsaad@gm

Re: [spring] Completion of WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

Hi All, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Best regards, Zhenbin (Robin) From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard Sent: Friday, February 12, 2021 1:06 AM To: James Guichard mailto:james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>>; spring@ietf.org

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

Hi WG, I support the adoption as the contributor. It has been three years since the first version of the draft was proposed. After long-term work, the solution is mature and well-accepted. The draft is well written and ready for adoption. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) From: spring [mailto:sp

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03

Hi All, I support the adoption of the draft. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) -- 李振斌 Li Zhenbin Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068 Email: lizhen...@huawei.com 发件人：James Guichard 收件人：spring 抄 送：ippm-chairs ;spring-c

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm-11

Hi All, I support the adoption of the draft. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) -- 李振斌 Li Zhenbin Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068 Email: lizhen...@huawei.com 发件人：James Guichard 收件人：spring 抄 送：IPPM Chairs ;spri

[spring] 答复: WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-srv6-yang

Hi All, I support the adoption of the draft. There has been multiple implementations of SRv6. The YANG model will facilitate the interworking for the configuration. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) 发件人: spring [spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 James Gui

[spring] 答复: WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-sr-policy-yang

Hi All, I support the WG adoption of the draft. SR Policy is an important feature and there are multiple implementations. The adoption of the YANG models will be helpful for the interworking. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) From: spring On Behalf Of James Guichard Sent: 13 July 2020 2

[spring] 答复: 答复: IPv6+??

, Robin 发件人: UTTARO, JAMES [ju1...@att.com] 发送时间: 2020年7月4日 18:51 收件人: Mark Smith; Lizhenbin 抄送: SPRING WG; Andrew Alston 主题: RE: [spring] 答复: IPv6+?? Where are the requirements.. I mean actual ones.. Thanks, Jim Uttaro From: spring On Behalf Of

[spring] 答复: 答复: IPv6+??

/draft-li-cross-ietf-area-work-00 You can see that the work in IPv6+ is another try to cope with the issue. Best Regards, Robin 发件人: Mark Smith [markzzzsm...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2020年7月4日 18:39 收件人: Lizhenbin 抄送: Andrew Alston; SPRING WG 主题: Re: [spring] 答复

[spring] 答复: IPv6+??

Hi Andrew, Thanks for your paying attention to the website. Please refer to my clarification. a. SRv6 is the technology based on IPv6. In the past 20+ years IPv6 has being deployed. One of the most important drives is the address space. The development of 5G and cloud proposes the new chance

[spring] 答复: WG LC https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/

support. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) Dear SPRING WG: This email starts a two week WG LC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/. Substantive comments should be directed to the mailing list no later than July 7th. Editorial suggestions can be sent to

[spring] 答复: Leadership change

Thanks Rob for your hard work. Congratulations to Jim and Joel! Wish you and Bruno to move SR work forward steadily. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) On 2020-06-14, 4:25 PM, "spring on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote: WG, Rob had decided to step down as chair some time ago. Th

[spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

Hi Bruno and WG, The LC has lasted for almost 3 months which greatly exceeds the expected 2 week. In the process all the comments have been resolved while some issues is raised again and again with little value. On the other hand, there have been multiple commercial implementation and inter-op t

[spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-li-spring-compressed-srv6-np-01.txt

solutions and we will promote them together. Your comments are welcome. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) 发件人: internet-dra...@ietf.org [internet-dra...@ietf.org] 发送时间: 2020年1月23日 16:39 收件人: Daniel Voyer; Lizhenbin; Kihoon LEE; Cong Li; Feng Zhao; Li Cong

[spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-cl-spring-generalized-srv6-np-00.txt

[internet-dra...@ietf.org] 发送时间: 2020年2月11日 17:39 收件人: Lizhenbin; Weiqiang Cheng; Feng Zhao; Chengli (Cheng Li); Li Cong; Chongfeng Xie; Hui Tian; Cong Li 主题: New Version Notification for draft-cl-spring-generalized-srv6-np-00.txt A new version of I-D, draft-cl-spring-generalized-srv6-np-00.txt has

[spring] 答复: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early Allocation Call

I support this early allocation. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) From: spring on behalf of "bruno.decra...@orange.com" Date: Thursday, December 19, 2019 at 11:55 AM To: SPRING WG Subject: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early Allocation Call Hi SPRING WG, T

Re: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-tian-spring-srv6-deployment-consideration-00.txt

a 收件人：Lizhenbin 抄 送：Chongfeng Xie ;Feng Zhao ;Hui Tian ;Jichun Ma ;Tong Li ;Xiaoyaqun ;ipv6 ;spring 时 间：2019-12-09 16:29:35 主题Re: New Version Notification for draft-tian-spring-srv6-deployment-consideration-00.txt Hi Lizhenbin & authors of spring SRv6 deployment considerations draft & Spri

Re: [spring] IPR poll for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR on this document. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) -Original Message- From: spring On Behalf Of bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent: 05 December 2019 22:20 To: 'SPRING WG List' ; draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming Subject: [spring] IPR poll for d

[spring] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-tian-spring-srv6-deployment-consideration-00.txt

) 发件人: internet-dra...@ietf.org [internet-dra...@ietf.org] 发送时间: 2019年11月4日 21:39 收件人: Lizhenbin; Feng Zhao; Xiaoyaqun; Jichun Ma; Pengshuping (Peng Shuping); Chongfeng Xie; Hui Tian; Tong Li 主题: New Version Notification for draft-tian-spring-srv6-deployment

[spring] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-matsushima-spring-srv6-deployment-status-02.txt

rds, Robin 发件人: internet-dra...@ietf.org [internet-dra...@ietf.org] 发送时间: 2019年10月15日 11:15 收件人: Zafar Ali; Clarence Filsfils; Lizhenbin; Satoru Matsushima 主题: New Version Notification for draft-matsushima-spring-srv6-deployment-status-02.txt A new version of

[spring] 答复: Beyond SRv6.

Hi Folks, I have explained opinions in the session meeting of IETF104. Here I would like to summarize it agian: 1. Problem Statement There are three three major concerns about SRH: 1) Path MTU: In theory it may be an issue. But as the develoment of the link layer technology, the network admin

Re: [spring] IETF105 APN6 Side Meeting, Thursday Moring @Notre Dame Room

uping) 发送时间: 2019年7月17日 11:18 收件人: 6man WG; spring@ietf.org 抄送: Lizhenbin 主题: IETF105 APN6 Side Meeting, Thursday Moring @Notre Dame Room Dear all, We are planning a Application-aware IPv6 Networking (APN6) Side meeting at this IETF Thursday morning @Notre Dame Room. Please find the meeting informat

[spring] New Version Notification for draft-li-spring-compressed-srv6-np-00.txt

Hi Folks, We submited the draft to propose a method to compress Segemnt Routing Header (SRH) for SRv6. Your comments are welcome. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) 发件人: internet-dra...@ietf.org [internet-dra...@ietf.org] 发送时间: 2019年7月22日 8:47 收件人: Lizhenbin

[spring] 答复: WG Adoption Call: draft-guichard-spring-nsh-sr

I support the adoption. The solution can be used for some important application scenarios combining with SR and NSH and the draft has been discussed for a long time. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) 发件人: spring [spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Rob Shakir

[spring] 答复: WG Adoption Call: draft-xuclad-spring-sr-service-programming

I support the adoption. It is an important application scenario of SRv6 and the draft has been discussed and revised for a long time. It is a right time for adoption. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) 发件人: spring [spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Satoru Matsushim

[spring] 答复: IPR Poll for draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming

I am not aware of any IPR about the draft except the disclosed one. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) 发件人: bruno.decra...@orange.com [bruno.decra...@orange.com] 发送时间: 2019年3月14日 2:50 收件人: SPRING WG 抄送: draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programm...@ietf

[spring] 答复: Working Group Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming

Support as the co-author. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) 发件人: bruno.decra...@orange.com [bruno.decra...@orange.com] 发送时间: 2019年3月14日 2:49 收件人: SPRING WG 抄送: draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programm...@ietf.org 主题: Working Group Adoption Call for draf

[spring] 答复: IPR Poll for draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming

Support as the co-author. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 2:50 AM To: SPRING WG Cc: draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programm...@ietf.org Subject: [spring] IPR Poll for dra

Re: [spring] draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming

SRv6 network programming is an important work for the network evolution. After refining many times the draft is already stable. Besides the implementation and inter-op test info proposed, this week it was published that there was already the commercial deployment of SRv6. Hope the draft can be ad

Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-cheng-spring-mpls-path-segment

Hi WG, Yes, support the draft to be adopted by the WG. Path segment is an important work for the scenarios of SR OAM/PM, etc. Thanks, Zhenbin (Robin) On 2019-02-20, 4:01 AM, "bruno.decra...@orange.com" wrote: Hi SPRING WG, This email initiates a two week call for working gro

Re: [spring] draft-xu-mpls-sr-over-ip

Hi Loa, I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Best regards, Zhenbin (Robin) -- From:Loa Andersson mailto:l...@pi.nu>> Send Time:2018年6月7日(星期四) 18:15 To:m...@ietf.org mailto:m...@ietf.org>> Cc:spring@ietf.org mailto:sprin

Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy

Support. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Zafar Ali (zali) Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2018 1:08 AM To: Rob Shakir ; SPRING WG List Cc: Zafar Ali (zali) Subject: Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routin

[spring] 答复: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: SPRING - rechartering discussion

The SR-TE policy work has been done for a long time in SRPING WG. In addition though the name is a little misleading, I would like to remind you of the work of the draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-02 which has much relation with the draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy-05 in SPRI

[spring] 答复: [mpls] [sfc] The MPLS WG has placed draft-farrel-mpls-sfc in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

I have read draft-xuclad-spring-sr-service-chaining and draft-farrel-mpls-sfc. In essence the SR-MPLS SFC solutions proposed in the two drafts are similar. I think the easiest way to solve the confliction is to remove the section 6 of draft-farrel-mpls-sfc, then the updated draft goes on for MPL

[spring] Implementation Report on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop

Hi Folks, I proposed my concern on the implementation of interoperability between LDP and SR again in IETF. I also would like to remind you of my draft again: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-spring-compare-sr-ldp-rsvpte-00 In this draft I explained the possible challenges of SR comparing L

[spring] Solicit Comments on draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00 and draft-li-pce-tunnel-segment-00

Hi Folks, We proposes two drafts on the new type of segment in the segment routing: draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00 and draft-li-pce-tunnel-segment-00. -- draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00 proposes the possible usecases such as reduce SID stack depth of SR path, span the non-SR domain or prov

[spring] Regarding "Semantics Independent" Flowspec//答复: 答复: [Idr] New draft - Flowspec Path Redirect

/Group ID. Best Regards, Zhenbin(Robin) 发件人: VAN DE VELDE, Gunter (Gunter) [mailto:gunter.van_de_ve...@alcatel-lucent.com] 发送时间: 2015年9月28日 20:29 收件人: Lizhenbin; Gunter Van De Velde; Robert Raszuk 抄送: i...@ietf.org; p...@ietf.org 主题: Re: 答复: [Idr] New draft - Flowspec Path Redirect Dear

[spring] New Comments on Segment Routing(9): Challenge of Interoperability of SR with LDP

Hi all authors of segment routing, This is the ninth comments to discuss the possible issues proposed by the interoperability of SR with LDP. In fact, I have not read the draft draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-02 yet. According to the past experience, I think the possilbe

[spring] 答复: New Comments on Segment Routing(8): Loop Prevention and Error Handling for SR

Hi Robert, Pleaser refer to my inline comments. Regards, Robin 发件人: rras...@gmail.com [rras...@gmail.com] 代表 Robert Raszuk [rob...@raszuk.net] 发送时间: 2015年1月28日 20:54 收件人: Lizhenbin 抄送: spring@ietf.org; m...@ietf.org; t...@ietf.org 主题: Re: [spring] New

[spring] 答复: New Comments on Segment Routing(7): MTU Challenges for SR

Hi Uma, Please refer to my inline comments. Regards, Robin 发件人: Uma Chunduri [uma.chund...@ericsson.com] 发送时间: 2015年1月29日 12:01 收件人: Lizhenbin; Hannes Gredler 抄送: m...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org; t...@ietf.org 主题: RE: [spring] New Comments on Segment Routing

[spring] 答复: New Comments on Segment Routing(7): MTU Challenges for SR

Hi Greg, Please refer to my inline comments. Regards, Robin 发件人: Gregory Mirsky [gregory.mir...@ericsson.com] 发送时间: 2015年1月29日 7:26 收件人: Lizhenbin; Hannes Gredler 抄送: m...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org; t...@ietf.org 主题: RE: [spring] New Comments on Segment

[spring] New Comments on Segment Routing(8): Loop Prevention and Error Handling for SR

Hi all authors of segment routing, This is the eighth comments. The issues proposed here apply to both SR-TE path and SR-BE path. For LDP and RSVP-TE, there is the loop prevention mechanism when setup LSP. For the SR, the SR path is always setup at the ingress node. It is difficult to dete

[spring] 答复: New Comments on Segment Routing(7): MTU Challenges for SR

, Robin 发件人: Hannes Gredler [han...@juniper.net] 发送时间: 2015年1月28日 4:01 收件人: Lizhenbin 抄送: spring@ietf.org; m...@ietf.org; t...@ietf.org 主题: Re: [spring] New Comments on Segment Routing(7): MTU Challenges for SR only can speak for IS-IS - afaik the Trill

[spring] New Comments on Segment Routing(7): MTU Challenges for SR

Hi all authors of segment routing, This is the seventh commens. The issues proposed here are for both SR-TE path and SR-BE path. 1 1 11 S11---S12--S13-S14-S15 | || | |

[spring] New Comments on Segment Routing(6): Challenge of Loose Explicit Path for SR-TE Path

Hi all authors of segment routing, This is the sixth comments on segment routing. It is another issue related with SR-TE path. S4---S5 / \ S1---S2---S3 S8---S9---S10 \ / S6---S7 For MPLS TE, there are tw

[spring] New Comments on Segment Routing(5): Challenge of Hot-standby for SR-TE Path

Hi all authors of segment routing, This is the fifth comments on segment routing. It is related with SR-TE path and I include the TEAS WG in the dicussion. 1 1 11 S11---S12--S13-S14-S15 | |

[spring] 答复: 答复: New Comments on Segment Routing(4): Challenge of Route Dependency for SR-BE Path

22:15 收件人: Lizhenbin; Robert Raszuk 抄送: m...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org 主题: Re: [spring] 答复: New Comments on Segment Routing(4): Challenge of Route Dependency for SR-BE Path Hi Robin, I don’t know about other IGP implementations but the ones I’ve worked on do not resolve routes recursively (unlike

[spring] 答复: 答复: New Comments on Segment Routing(4): Challenge of Route Dependency for SR-BE Path

label fowarding entry is created on A, B, C? Regards, Robin 发件人: rras...@gmail.com [rras...@gmail.com] 代表 Robert Raszuk [rob...@raszuk.net] 发送时间: 2015年1月22日 19:14 收件人: Lizhenbin 抄送: spring@ietf.org; m...@ietf.org 主题: Re: 答复: [spring] New Comments on

[spring] 答复: New Comments on Segment Routing(4): Challenge of Route Dependency for SR-BE Path

Hi Robert, Please refer to my inline '[Robin]'. Regards, Robin 发件人: rras...@gmail.com [rras...@gmail.com] 代表 Robert Raszuk [rob...@raszuk.net] 发送时间: 2015年1月22日 15:46 收件人: Lizhenbin 抄送: spring@ietf.org; m...@ietf.org 主题: Re: [spring] New Comments

[spring] New Comments on Segment Routing(4): Challenge of Route Dependency for SR-BE Path

Hi all authors of segment routing, This is the fourth comments. For LDP, when search route for the destination address which is the FEC of the label mapping, it should search the FIB in which the routes are selected from the static route, OSPF, ISIS, BGP, etc based on the preferences. Now t

[spring] New Comments on Segment Routing(3): Challenge of DoD and Inter-area extensions for SR-BE Path

Hi all authors of segment routing, This is the third comments. +---+ +---+ +--+ +--+ | | | | | | | | +--+ AGN11 +---+ AGN21 +---+ ABR1 +---+ LSR1 +--> to AGN / | | /| | | |

[spring] 答复: New Comments on Segment Routing(2): Challenge of Proxy Egress for SR-BE Path

Hi Bruno, Please see inline [Robin]. I clarify my challenges. Hope you rethink it. Thanks & Regards, Robin 发件人: bruno.decra...@orange.com [bruno.decra...@orange.com] 发送时间: 2015年1月18日 18:39 收件人: Lizhenbin; spring@ietf.org 抄送: m...@ietf.org 主题: RE:

[spring] 答复: New Comments on Segment Routing(1): Challenge of Ordered mode for SR-BE Path and Incremental Deployment

Hi Bruno, Please refer to my inline comments identified with '[Robin]'. Regards, Robin 发件人: bruno.decra...@orange.com [bruno.decra...@orange.com] 发送时间: 2015年1月18日 18:13 收件人: Lizhenbin; spring@ietf.org 主题: RE: New Comments on Segment Routing(1):

[spring] New Comments on Segment Routing(2): Challenge of Proxy Egress for SR-BE Path

Hi all authors of segment routing, This is the second issue. In order for better understanding and discussion, I include MPLS WG in the discussion. I will propose one use case of LDP proxy egress: Inter-AS VPN Option C PE11ASBR11ASBR21---PE21 | |

[spring] 答复: New Comments on Segment Routing(1): Challenge of Ordered mode for SR-BE Path and Incremental Deployment

effect on the normal traffic in the network. Best Regards, Robin 发件人: bruno.decra...@orange.com [bruno.decra...@orange.com] 发送时间: 2015年1月15日 23:56 收件人: Lizhenbin; spring@ietf.org 主题: RE: New Comments on Segment Routing(1): Challenge of Ordered mode for

[spring] 答复: New Comments on Segment Routing(1): Challenge of Ordered mode for SR-BE Path and Incremental Deployment

发件人: bruno.decra...@orange.com [bruno.decra...@orange.com] 发送时间: 2015年1月15日 23:56 收件人: Lizhenbin; spring@ietf.org 主题: RE: New Comments on Segment Routing(1): Challenge of Ordered mode for SR-BE Path and Incremental Deployment Hi Robin, Thanks for your interest

[spring] 答复: New Comments on Segment Routing(1): Challenge of Ordered mode for SR-BE Path and Incremental Deployment

Hi Bruno, Please refer to my comments inline identified by '[Robin]'. Regards, Robin 发件人: bruno.decra...@orange.com [bruno.decra...@orange.com] 发送时间: 2015年1月16日 15:55 收件人: DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN; Lizhenbin; spring@ietf.org 主题: RE: New Comments

[spring] New Comments on Segment Routing(1): Challenge of Ordered mode for SR-BE Path and Incremental Deployment

Hi all authors of segment routing, When we did research on segment routing and found some new issues. Could you help clarify if the analysis is right and how will they be taken into account in the design of SR. This is the first issue. (Non-SR) S11---S1

[spring] Comments on draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-02

Hi authors, The usecase proposed by the draft is useful and worth research. We review the draft and find there may be some errors about the process description in Sec 5.3 and 5.4. Please refer to our attched detailed comments illustrated (identified by "Comments Begin" and "Comments End"). The

[spring] Comments on Section 2.4//WG Adoption Call for draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6-use-cases

Alvaro, Regarding the section IPv6 Segment Routing in the Core networks, I have following comments: In order to justify the requirement, I think it tries to romove all possible options for the designed core network: -- MPLS: it is definitely be removed firstly. -- L2VPN/L3VPN: it is related with

[spring] Comments on Section 2.3//WG Adoption Call for draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6-use-cases

Alvaro, Please refer to following comments regarding Section 2.3 of draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6-use-cases These sections describe the use cases of segment routing in data center network. 1. I wonder if now there is a hot discussion on using IPv6 in data center. What is the drive to

[spring] Comments on Section 2.1 and 2.2//WG Adoption Call for draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6-use-cases

Alvaro, Please refer to following comments regarding Section 2.1 and 2.2 of draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6-use-cases These sections describe the use cases of segment routing in home network and access network. I would like to quote the text which concerns MPLS scalability in section

[spring] Comments on Section 2//WG Adoption Call for draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6-use-cases

Alvaro, Please refer to following comments regarding Section 2 of draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6-use-cases ' To reach the same scale, an operator would need to introduce additional complexity, such as mechanisms described in [I-D.ietf-mpls-seamless-mpls] '

[spring] Comments on Abstraction//WG Adoption Call for draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6-use-cases

Alvaro, Abstraction of draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6-use-cases presents as follows: ' SPRING allows to enforce a flow through any topological path and service chain while maintaining per-flow state only at the ingress node to the SPRING domain. ' I wonder if now SPRING s

[spring] 答复: Comments on Section 2// WG Adoption Call for draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6-use-cases

Alvaro, Section 2 of draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6-use-cases presents as follows: " 4. There is a need to connect millions of addressable segment endpoints, thus high routing scalability is a requirement. IPv6 addresses are inherently summarizable: a very lar

[spring] Comments on Section 2// WG Adoption Call for draft-francois-spring-resiliency-use-case

Alvaro, Section 2 of draft-francois-spring-resiliency-use-case presents as follows: " From an SR viewpoint, we would like to highlight the following requirement: the adjacency segments used to support the tunnels T1 and T2 MUST NOT benefit from local protection. This is achieved by

[spring] Comments on Section 3// WG Adoption Call for WG Adoption Call for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement(updated)

Alvaro, Section 3 of draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement presents as follows: " The source-based routing model, applied to the MPLS dataplane, offers the ability to tunnel services (VPN, VPLS, VPWS) from an ingress PE to an egress PE, without any other protocol than IGPs (ISIS or OS

[spring] Comments on Section 3// WG Adoption Call for draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6-use-cases

Alvaro, Section 3 of draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement presents as follows: " The source-based routing model, applied to the MPLS dataplane, offers the ability to tunnel services (VPN, VPLS, VPWS) from an ingress PE to an egress PE, without any other protocol than IGPs (ISIS or OS