Alvaro,


Section 2 of draft-francois-spring-resiliency-use-case presents as follows:



"
   From an SR viewpoint, we would like to highlight the following
   requirement: the adjacency segments used to support the tunnels T1
   and T2 MUST NOT benefit from local protection.  This is achieved by
   resetting the B-flag in the related AdjSID's as per the IGP
   extensions defined in [3].
"



It is too detailed to define like "This is achieved by resetting the B-flag in 
the related AdjSID's as per the IGP   extensions defined in [3]". The use case 
should be defined well instead of protocol procedures.





Regards,

Zhenbin(Robin)







> Hi!
>
> This message officially starts the call for adoption for
> draft-francois-spring-resiliency-use-case.
>
> Please indicate your position about adopting this use cases draft
> by end-of-day on March 27, 2014.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-francois-spring-resiliency-use-case
>
> Thanks!
>
> Alvaro.

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to