On August 28, 2024 at 7:31:23 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote:
Greg:
Hi!
...
> > 516 12. Security Considerations
> >
> > 518 Security considerations discussed in [RFC5880], [RFC5884], [RFC7726],
> > 519 and [RFC8029] apply to this document.
> >
> > < minor > I think some more text would be required here
Hello Mirsky,
Long time no see, hope you are doing great!
Well, I agree with you that we can use STAMP and other active OAM methods, this
is obviously.
This document defines the SRv6 Path Segment which is similar to SR-MPLS Path
Segment, even regarding this point, they can be used in the same w
Hi Joel, I added some terms in the proposed update. Please see the diff here：
https://github.com/muzixing/SRv6-Path-Segment/blob/main/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-10.diff%20(1).html
We may upload the draft ASAP once we get the feedback from authors.
Basically, I prefer not to create a new
Hi Yao,
Thank you for your review and comments, please see my reply inline.
In order not to add attachment in the email to ML, I uploaded the xml, html and
diff html files in the github repository.
Please down load the diff file to see the diff:
https://github.com/muzixing/SRv6-Path-Segment/blob
Hi Cheng,
I think that there some information about the per SR Policy performance
measurement is not clear to me. AFAIK, performance measurement methods
support concurrent test sessions over the same path between the particular
set (p2p or p2mp) of systems. For example, in STAMP one can use Stamp
S
Speaking as a participant, it seems that at least a clear explanation of
what the path-id identifies in the SRv6 usage, which covers case 2,
would be helpful. Whether that means the naming should change I leave
to others. We often have names that do not quite fit the evolution of
mechanisms.
Hi Joel,
Thank you for your email.
We might think about two type of cases here.
1. A segment list use a single PSID(Segment list: PSID is 1:1): this is a
normal case, can be covered by other text in the draft, no special text is
needed. All the SR Policy use the same PSID for a specific se
Hi WG,
I have reviewed this draft. It provides a method for the application
such as bidirectional tunnel binding, network performance measurement and so
on. I think it's mature and completed. Hope it could be moved forward quickly.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Haojie Wang
China Mobile Resear
