s a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
pgpCD4T6LwCA1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Debian.
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
pgpuwwvfgjRzv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
pgpSAC9FEmhLi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
on this kind of scale.
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
pgpVtziVZBZH2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
pgpYTXwngE2fn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
vote?
I think a committee should have to disband itself.
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
pgp1B02PTZTmB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
?) messy.
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
pgpeisjHi9w94.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Or do you think that the constitution is hindering or regulating
too much in Debian?
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.w
icense, or a committee to
organize a single booth, etc.).
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~w
ytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
pgpIKe8AbaVXd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
rence when selecting
members if enough people volunteern
> - what should the internal structure of the committee look like?
Depends highly on the committee, and as such this probably shouldn't
be in the bylaws.
Wichert.
--
=======
known I guess.
> Is what you are saying, "If a leaer leaves, the BOD is to consult with the
> leaving leader before appointing a new leader"??
Yes.
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes forms a messa
e.
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
pgpFYelYuZ1nf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e are no objections against this? We have the
machine and we already know Berlin..
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.
Previously Josip Rodin wrote:
> % host -t soa opensource.org
> opensource.org SOA buoy.com tps.buoy.com (
> [...]
That is Tim Sailer.
> % host -t mx opensource.org
> opensource.org MX 5 ns.crynwr.com
And that is ESR iirc.
> What's up with that?
We're not hosting it?
Previously Josip Rodin wrote:
> Ah. :) It seems I misunderstood the whois information then.
Who owns a domain and who hosts it are very different things..
Wichert.
--
_
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fo
Previously Martin Schulze wrote:
> FYI
The domain expired a while ago, Vincent said he would renew it
but doesn't have time to work on it anymore.
Wichert.
--
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
Previously Josip Rodin wrote:
> Uh, I don't remember doing this commit, and it certainly doesn't look like
> my style of writing CVS logs... could it be that the script thinks that all
> pserver users are me?
Yes. Same thing happens with pserver on the dpkg CVS archive, which
is why we don't use p
I just finished installing a new exim on purcel. The major
feature of the new version is that it supports STARTTLS
for SMTP connections, so if possible it will use an
encrypted connection to transfer email.
Wichert.
--
_
/
Previously Martin Schulze wrote:
> Thing is that you have to ckeck for CVS_USER and not just LOGNAME.
> iirc.
The script just uses mail to send, so it'll use whatever accountname
it's running as. No variable used.
Wichert.
--
_
Previously Martin Schulze wrote:
> It has happened. Minutes were sent to the board recently. The next
> meeting is on August 6th.
If you want the minutes on the web you should send them to admin
as well..
Wichert.
--
_
/
Previously Oliver Elphick wrote:
> I get the following messages when accessing https://www.spi-inc.org/:
The problem here is that https://www.spi-inc.org/ should not exist,
the only https bit is the members part. Unfortunately since they run on
the same IP address I can't avoid that error.
Wicher
Previously John Goerzen wrote:
> We return 550 during the SMTP conversation. If this was something from
> a real human, they'd be contacting us another way.
Personally I just give up on the person/organisation rejecting my mail.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
is that votes seem to be stored on that
> server indefinitely. Any webmaster of members.spi-inc could see all
> of our past votes back to at least 2004, right?
No, a script is run post-vote that removes the relation between the vote
and the votee.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman &
Previously MJ Ray wrote:
> Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Previously MJ Ray wrote:
> > > One way they are not secret is that votes seem to be stored on that
> > > server indefinitely. Any webmaster of members.spi-inc could see all
> > &g
; > members are responsible for the operation of the corporation. So I
> > would like the Board to commit to a date, and provide a plan by which
> > it will be achieved.
>
> I hope the board will react, but I suspect we'll be told we need 21
> members or a bo
s by
> breaking those rules.
When were those requests submitted to SPI's legal and financal advisors?
Surely they must be able to answer such a question quickly?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/
Previously Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 04:39:26PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> > Surely they must be able to answer such a question quickly?
>
> There are many questions one might have expected to be easily
> answerable, that turn out to take ye
Previously Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 05:20:09PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > The experience from my SPI board days a long time ago is that advisors
> > are normally very fast, but that it can take a very long time for the
> > board to actually
t; research the issues and get back to me this week. I'll ask them for a
> status update.
That was last Thursday. Did we get or set a new deadline?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
on, but that should be a
> few $VCS add/comit/push commands only.
Out of curiosity: why?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Spi-general mailing
Previously MJ Ray wrote:
> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Previously Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > > For the website, do not assume we stay with Plone much longer. Currently
> > > you can assume we are switching to ikiwiki and have the storage in
> > > git. So thats
Previously MJ Ray wrote:
> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Previously MJ Ray wrote: [...]
> > > 2. it should allow easier contributions from people without prior
> > > approval - able to edit stuff without ever touching an spi machine;
> >
> > Plone should mak
by.
I wonder why that is relevant to the SPI website though. Did the SPI
website suddenly start doing more than a few dozen hits per day?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to m
Previously Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> {Python}
>
> Google?
youtube at least
W.
--
Wichert Akkerman It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Spi-general mailing list
Sp
e thing, or are
> > there several ? It would be nice to be able to let people edit the
> > website without giving them the power to run code on the server, for
> > example.
>
> Noone gets access to the server directly. :)
Did you install the gitweb security fix? :)
Wiche
that might be a security risk.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
http://lists.spi-inc.o
On 11/10/10 14:00 , David Graham wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Adrian Bunk wrote:
You don't need a code of conduct for going to the police and report a
crime.
I come down firmly only the side of Adrian on this.
Amen. I would boycot events which try to be stricter than the law or
which try to
On 11/10/10 16:11 , John Goerzen wrote:
On 11/10/2010 07:15 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 11/10/10 14:00 , David Graham wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Adrian Bunk wrote:
You don't need a code of conduct for going to the police and report a
crime.
I come down firmly only the side of Adri
On 11/10/10 18:10 , Ian Jackson wrote:
John Goerzen writes ("Re: Code of Conduct at events"):
I'm still not sure that a "code of conduct" is really the right thing.
I'm not attached to the "Code of Conduct" phrase. Another way to put
it would be "Policy on Behaviour at the Conference".
But I
On 11/11/10 17:57 , Ian Jackson wrote:
I _am_ suggesting that if the conference organisers receive a
complaint that Bob seriously sexually assaulted Alice, they should
investigate. If on investigation they are sufficiently convinced that
it's true, they should eject Bob.
I think many of us dis
On 11/11/10 18:23 , Ian Jackson wrote:
Wichert Akkerman writes ("Re: Code of Conduct at events"):
On 11/11/10 17:57 , Ian Jackson wrote:
I _am_ suggesting that if the conference organisers receive a
complaint that Bob seriously sexually assaulted Alice, they should
investiga
On 02 Mar 2014, at 18:02, Jeremy Baron wrote:
> On Feb 27, 2014 6:46 PM, "TJ" wrote:
> > Most sites and browsers support SNI in which case multiple IPs aren't
> > required, although to
> > handle those user agents that don't support SNI it is usual to make the
> > server's default site
> > be t
> On 11 Dec 2015, at 00:04, Bill Allombert
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:09:03PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> Pricing structure:
>> https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-620
>>
>> * One-off sign-up fee 2 000 EUR (approx. 2 188 USD)
>> * annual fee of 1 600 EUR (approx.
> On 16 Feb 2018, at 14:58, Philip Balister wrote:
>
> On 02/16/2018 08:48 AM, Peter Cock wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>>> * Peter Cock [2018-02-15 16:51]:
Does this mean none of the other SPI projects currently pay for
AWS at the moment?
>>>
>
45 matches
Mail list logo
