Previously Martin Schulze wrote: > 6. Since SPI and affiliated projects will (at least partially) depend > on donations and dedication it is not acceptable that this > donation or dedication may be terminated at any time. This could > cause major problems for associated projects.
I think you need a loophole in here that in some situations a donator can require immediate termination. For example if something weird happens and the donator might get into legal problems or thinks that SPI abuses the donations. I also miss the ability to earmark donations for a specific goal. A donator should be able to say for example `I have this listserver you can use, but only for security-related projects', or any other possible restriction. Without this it is also impossible to make a donation specifically for a single SPI project, such as Debian. Wichert. -- ============================================================================== This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman. E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
pgpuwwvfgjRzv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
