On 10 Dec 2019, at 10:19 am, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> * Bdale Garbee [2019-12-09 15:59]:
>> It's not clear to me why you need to rescind the resolution instead of
>> just continuing to not actually appoint or seek advice from existing
>> appointees. What's the problem you're actually trying
Hi,
Le 2019-12-09 à 18:19, Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
* Bdale Garbee [2019-12-09 15:59]:
It's not clear to me why you need to rescind the resolution instead of
just continuing to not actually appoint or seek advice from existing
appointees. What's the problem you're actually trying to solve?
* Bdale Garbee [2019-12-09 15:59]:
> It's not clear to me why you need to rescind the resolution instead of
> just continuing to not actually appoint or seek advice from existing
> appointees. What's the problem you're actually trying to solve?
Make sure reality is reflected.
The annual report
Tim Potter writes:
> Hi everyone. One item discussed at a recent meeting of the SPI board was
> concerning the position of Board Advisors. Many years ago Board Advisors
> served a useful purpose but have not been used in a very long time. It is
> proposed in this resolution[1] to rescind the posi
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 10:36:06PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Tim Potter [2019-12-09 20:17]:
> > Hi everyone. One item discussed at a recent meeting of the SPI board was
> > concerning the position of Board Advisors. Many years ago Board Advisors
> > served a useful purpose but have not be
* Tim Potter [2019-12-09 20:17]:
> Hi everyone. One item discussed at a recent meeting of the SPI board was
> concerning the position of Board Advisors. Many years ago Board Advisors
> served a useful purpose but have not been used in a very long time. It is
> proposed in this resolution[1] to res
