On 10 Dec 2019, at 10:19 am, Martin Michlmayr <t...@cyrius.com> wrote: > > * Bdale Garbee <bd...@gag.com> [2019-12-09 15:59]: >> It's not clear to me why you need to rescind the resolution instead of >> just continuing to not actually appoint or seek advice from existing >> appointees. What's the problem you're actually trying to solve? > > Make sure reality is reflected. > > The annual report lists the advisors, but they haven't been consulted > in years, so imho it makes sense to reflect that. It also creates > more balance between projects (why is the Debian project leader always > an advisor?)
Just curious - is there was any more discussion on this topic? Perhaps we can make a decision one way or the other at the board meeting next week. Tim. _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
