On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 10:36:06PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Tim Potter <t...@frungy.org> [2019-12-09 20:17]: > > Hi everyone. One item discussed at a recent meeting of the SPI board was > > concerning the position of Board Advisors. Many years ago Board Advisors > > served a useful purpose but have not been used in a very long time. It is > > proposed in this resolution[1] to rescind the positions of SPI Board > > Advisors. > > I think there should be some rationale in the resolution as to why, > i.e. that this is not a reduction in transparency but a reflection > that monthly SPI board meetings are open and that everyone is > invited to participate (rather than limiting input to some special > advisors).
That plus: - (1) we don't actually reach out to the advisors for input (as far as I've seen since I was elected a few years ago) - (2) if we want input from someone, we can just ask them without appointing them as an advisor -- Luca Filipozzi _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general