This might be an issue of scale.
I'm probibly 800 messages every few minutes. A couple of thouasnd e-mail
acconts forwarded via spamc.
Is the script you ran available for download?
Jim writes:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 09:42:02PM -0400, Paul Farber wrote:
New machine... dual 1.2Gh
I'm running spamd in daemon mode and I get the following error:
File exists?Cannot open bayes_path /home/pop3/.spamassassin/bayes R/W: File
exists?Cannot open bayes_path /home/pop3/.spamassassin/bayes R/W: File
exists?
Also spamd dies frequently supervice has to restart it about every 20
That would depend on where you put the call to spamassassin. and how you
integrate SA into your mail system.
Brian Nath writes:
I'm a new installer of SpamAssassin on Red Hat ver 8 with the latest SA...
In the USAGE document for SA it states "*PLEASE* consider setting it up as
"off by de
But the way qmail-rbl works it will deny the mail based on the lookup, not
weight it appropiatly.
Roger Merchberger writes:
At 21:43 10/14/2003 -0400, Paul Farber wrote:
I tried the evilrules.cf on my dual AMD 1Gb 2 Ultra-SCSI qmail server and
it
died in minutes.
I run 100K+ emails in a 24
Check for lock files. There seems to be a 20 second timeout if (in my case,
it was the whitelist lockfile) gets stale. Look for minutes/days old
lockfiles, and clean them out.
I had steady 29+second spamd times, turned off all lookup etc, nothing
changed. Snooped in the spamd users dir (I a
5155
17.6 27873
5.9 5134
3.9 4048
6.9 9856
4.4 3976
4.3 7112
11.1 21048
4.9 9847
4.2 2780
its looking like a second per kb... but there are 12second 3K scans, and 4
second 4K scans.
Whats causing the 3X difference in msg scanning?
Thanks
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
570-628-5303
www.f
1342
8.4 1421
7.6 1456
11.3 1424
2.0 2099
2.2 4799
9.1 4901
2.4 1414
2.5 1414
3.6 1340
better... but still not getting the < 1 second per message.
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 19:46, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 06:21 PM 9/10/03 -0400, Paul Farber wrote:
> >Whats causing the
3
1.6 2953
0.5 1686
0.6 8309
0.5 2293
0.5 3100
0.6 1493
1.5 3801
These number do not match peak load numbers. I was in the 10-20second per msg
range between 6-9pm EST.
On Thursday 11 September 2003 22:17, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 09:42 PM 9/11/03 -0400, Paul Farber wrote:
> >New m
nesday 10 September 2003 19:46, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 06:21 PM 9/10/03 -0400, Paul Farber wrote:
> >Whats causing the 3X difference in msg scanning?
>
> Are you using _ANY_ network checks? DNS blacklists, razor2, dcc, pyzor, etc
> all have wildly varying times because they are
The spamassassin mentions several times about a user-prefs script using mysql
as a backend.. but the link to the spamassassin site does not list the file.
is it gone?
Can I get a copy?
Thanks
--
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
570-628-5303
www.f-tech.net
's prefs
to call up, and therefore the @GLOBAL settings are used.
Since I am using a single uid/gid to deliver mail to all users I cannot use
dir ownership (or can I?) Can I rip it out of the message somehow?
Any fellow qmail users up against this??
--
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
570
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
--
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
570-628-5303
www.f-tech.net
to join in!
>
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMA
gt; https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
> See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
> Click here: ht
14 matches
Mail list logo
