[SAtalk] problems with 2.01

in/spamd -d -a -L" I am getting this in /var/log/maillog quite often: spamd[18476]: Still running as root: user not specified, not found, or set to root. Fall back to nobody. Any help appreciated. --- Michael Geier CDM Sports, Inc. - Systems Administrator email:

[SAtalk] question regarding report-template and HTML email

current setup: report_header 0 terse_report0 in an HTML spam, the report looks like sh*t...does anyone have a solution? thanks...great product --- Michael Geier CDM Sports, Inc. - Systems Administrator email: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [SAtalk] question regarding report-template and HTML email

default mailbox with rewrite_subject=1) hmmm...guess I'll keep looking at the code. Thanks for the suggestions. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:17 AM To: Michael Geier; [sa

Re: [SAtalk] SA research

ail Sanitizer [http://www.impsec.org/email-tools/procmail-security.html] on our system; email-based virus free for 18 months) Only been using SA for two weeks now, but am very pleased with the product. Keep up the good work J. -- Michael Geier CDM Sports, Inc. - Systems Administrator email: [EMAIL

Re: [SAtalk] Virii protection

h the archives of this mailing list will result in numerous viable options. -- Michael Geier CDM Sports, Inc. - Systems Administrator email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quoting Arrchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > Just wondering, Does Spam Assassin Automatically protect from most virii

Re: [SAtalk] This one got thru

far from a regex expert). The only rule I found was: 20_body_tests.cf: body PENIS_ENLARGE /(?:(?:\bpenis\b|\benlarge).{0,50}){2,}/is -- Michael Geier CDM Sports, Inc. - Systems Administrator email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: 314.991.1511 x 6505 pager: 314.318.9414 || [EMAIL

[SAtalk] problem with Hotmail

23.234] From: "Michael Geier" <[snip]@hotmail.com> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test hotmail Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 14:37:34 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Feb 2002 19:37:35.0018 (UTC) F

[SAtalk] rule suggestion

The attached email slipped under the threshold. However, something caught my eye. Generally, the from: domain and the reply-to: domain don't match on spam. Maybe we could compare against that? -Original Headers- Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from emailpdc.CLIENTMAIL ([207.2

RE: [SAtalk] rule suggestion

but that would be an argument for personal whitelist (or even auto-whitelist once it has been improved). -Original Message- From: rODbegbie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 10:21 AM To: Michael Geier; SpamAssassin List Subject: Re: [SAtalk] rule suggestion

Re: [SAtalk] Re: rule suggestion

ult installations of outdated SMTP packages (ie. relay server). -- Michael Geier CDM Sports, Inc. - Systems Administrator email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: 314.991.1511 x 6505 pager: 314.318.9414 || [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quoting Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 12

RE: [SAtalk] [Fwd: IP: When spam relays become worm breeding grounds]

well, toad.com just made it into my access file for denied domains (along with Korea and China Telecom) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob > McMillin > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:14 PM > To: SAtalk > Subject: [SAtalk] [Fwd:

Re: [SAtalk] Freedom of Press / Speech / Junk Mail (yah right)

mplemented, or I could just roll my own (heavily influenced by SA rules and procedures). -- Michael Geier CDM Sports, Inc. - Systems Administrator email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: 314.991.1511 x 6505 pager: 314.318.9414 || [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quoting Craig Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]