Maybe some people are taking my recommendation a little to strongly.

In answer to your points:
[1]If you belong to a list that does it, put them in your whitelist (in my 
opinion, any list you belong to should be in a whitelist anyway).

[2] I frankly don't understand the point of that one...

[3] If people need control over where the replies are sent, is it impossible to 
have the original message sent from the same domain?  Whoever heard of a mail 
server you could retrieve from, but couldn't send from, or at least that SMTP 
and POP3/IMAP weren't in the same domain?

Also, nobody is saying score it like CTYPE_JUST_HTML...maybe only add 0.1 or 
0.05, but I find it to be a little sad most spammers these days tend to send 
from one address and reply-to another (neither of which is valid), and send off 
some asian relay who's admin is stupid enough to use default installations of 
outdated SMTP packages (ie. relay server).

-- 
Michael Geier
CDM Sports, Inc. - Systems Administrator
    email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    phone: 314.991.1511 x 6505
    pager: 314.318.9414 || [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Quoting Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Michael Geier wrote:
> > The attached email slipped under the threshold.
> > 
> > However, something caught my eye. Generally, the from: domain and the
> > reply-to: domain don't match on spam.
> > 
> > Maybe we could compare against that?
> 
> For the love of god, NOOOOOO!
> 
> It's bad enough the number of people out there who *already* believe
> that "Reply-To" means "From", then get offended when people obey the
> reply to and send responses only to the sender.
> 
> Making this change will make it impossible to:
> 
> 1) work with broken mailing lists that set reply-to to the list.
> 2) people who *need* reply-to to get any response[1]
> 3) people who want to control where email replies are sent.
> 
>         Daniel
> 
> Footnotes: 
> [1]  Which do exist, even if you haven't seen 'em.
> 
> -- 
> Increasing numbers of private-sector companies are discovering the 
> efficiency of hiring bright undergraduates or recent graduates and 
> paying them next to nothing.
>         -- Washingtonian magazine
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> 
> 


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through CDM Sports Webmail.

_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to