[SAtalk] Genetic Algorithm assigns some DNSBLs a score of 0? (Myunrejectv3)

2003-07-12 Thread I Am Jesus @sent
So, the default scores that SpamAssassin ships with are the ones that my ISP (fastmail.fm/sent.com) uses (Because of FAQ 1.5*.) The default scores are 0 for several RBLs. Is this policy or is it just that no one who participates in mass-check uses these RBLs, a bug of sorts? Unless the particip

Re: [SAtalk] Genetic Algorithm assigns some DNSBLs a score of 0?(Myunrejectv3)

2003-07-14 Thread I Am Jesus @sent
Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 01:19:34PM -0700, I Am Jesus @sent wrote: The default scores are 0 for several RBLs. Is this policy or is it just that no one who participates in mass-check uses these RBLs, a bug of sorts? The ones you specified aren't free. So the

Re: [SAtalk] Genetic Algorithm assigns some DNSBLs a score of 0?(Myunrejectv3)

2003-07-16 Thread I Am Jesus @sent
Matt Kettler wrote: Flipping back to your original post... Thankfully. I *think* what you are asking is that all the RBL's be GAed and then the "for pay" ones zeroed out later with their GA assigned scores in comments. Thanks for a clear and informative explanation that shows why a sensib