Let me revive an old theme:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:03:31AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 05:29:46PM +0400, Andrew A. Vasilyev wrote:
> > I get your point of view, but why didn't you put
> > the rule name at the end of former line in pa
> HS> are way too high - a lot of legitimate email gets flagged. I have
> HS> adjusted them for my system, but it might be nice to make spamassassin
> HS> less English centric out of the box.
>
> It is not English-centric. It is an RFC violation to have 8-bit
> characters there. Flagging RFC vio
Hi!
Is there any CVS mirror for SA project? Probably the
cvs.sourceforge.net is overloaded, too often aborting the connections.
ANDY
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Bec
Hi!
Could the developers be so kind to explain the reason for
changing the _REPORT_ template output format?
Old:
X-Spam-Report: -17.3 points, 5.0 required;
* 1.0 -- From: does not include a real name
* 0.4 -- BODY: HTML is missing "table" close tags
* 0.3 -- BO
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 09:21:21AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> I've always considered the "no rule names report format" a "duh" feature of
> SA, so I for one am glad for the change.
I get your point of view, but why didn't you put
the rule name at the end of former line in parenthesis.
An
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 03:55:48PM +0100, Sean Cardus wrote:
> I've done just that... In PerMsgStatus.pm I've changed lines 2214-2216
> to:
> $self->{test_logs} .= sprintf ("* % 2.1f -- %s%s [%s]\n%s",
> $score, $area, $desc,
> $r
