On December 02, 2003 06:49 pm, Gary Smith wrote:
> nor the general readme. ÂI have installed SA on a server for a NPO that
> generates a very large amount of email traffic. ÂIt has done a good job of
> filtering a lot of the spam for us thus far.
> The big problem is this NPO sends emails back and
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Lukreme wrote:
> spamd[33762]: Cannot open bayes databases
> /home/user/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed: Permission denied
> spamd[33762]: processing message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for kremels:5003.
> spamd[33762]: clean message (0.8/5.0) for user:5003 in 0.2 seconds,
> 55
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/12/2003 02:01, Gary Smith wrote:
> There are some freeware dll's that you can use to do the FTP/wget so
you don't have to do the shell. I don't see where you restart/reload
the service???
I have done a google for both recode and wget as dll's
Barry Porter said:
> I have done a google for both recode and wget as dll's but have come up
> with nothing other than a virus warning about wget.dll being used in an
> irc flood virus.
Barry,
http://www.gnu.org/software/wget/wget.html
should link you to
ftp://sunsite.dk/projects/wget/windows/
whe
Chris Thielen said:
> Barry,
> http://www.gnu.org/software/wget/wget.html
> should link you to
> ftp://sunsite.dk/projects/wget/windows/
> where you can snag win32 binaries for wget
Just ignore me... I shouldn't have jumped in and posted without reading
the whole thread. Sorry!
--
Chris Thielen
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 10:59:13 -0800 Mike D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know how to config spamassassin to delete messages with a score
> above a certain threshold?
This question gets asked every 3-5 days and really ought to be in the FAQ.
Answers generally focus on:
a) procmail
b)
Hi,
> Peter, if your still listening what character set are you running?
Sorry, been away for the weekend. I was using my SquirrelMail at the
time for posting so not sure. It should have just been plain text!
--
Regards,
+-+-+
| Pete
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Timprice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 21:50:06 -0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --> 78% D.1.SC0.UNT!! xvjtk crbqap
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/ht
Mark, sounds like you need Razor2::Client::Agent installed.
you can either install it as a perl module via the CPAN module or if you prefer
to keep things in RPM format you can use the cpan2rpm tool to make the module
before installing.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
I've recently upgraded to Shriek which comes with 2.44. my user_prefs used
to include a line like:
report_safe 0
but now I get an error like this:
> Dec 3 23:40:45 beowulf spamd[13358]: debug: Failed to parse line in
> SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: report_safe 0
in the current
Cheryl, I'm having the same problem (see posting "spamd piling up - just
killing me") on a Shriek (RH9) box running 2.44. 2.44 is the latest
available from RH but it's been suggested to me that I should upgrade to
2.60 (unfortunately I can't do that at present since Theo Van Dinter's site
is not m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm looking at the standard scoring of the BAYES rules and I see
50_scores.cf:score BAYES_80 0 0 5.300 2.862
50_scores.cf:score BAYES_90 0 0 4.027 3.002
50_scores.cf:score BAYES_99 0 0 5.200 3.008
if I'm reading this correctly more points are given f
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 12:24:16PM -0800, Erick Calder wrote:
> I've recently upgraded to Shriek which comes with 2.44. my user_prefs used
> to include a line like:
> report_safe 0
> in the current docs I find neither any mention of this setting nor an
> alternative... wtf?
report_safe was
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 02:46:39PM -0600, Michael Satterwhite wrote:
> Can some of you experts explain this one to me?
http://spamassassin.taint.org/faq/index.cgi?req=show&file=faq01.005.htp
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"The highest patriotism is not a blind acceptance of official policy, but
ah!! now I get it. I _was_ running 2.60 before "upgrading" to Shriek, which
actually downgraded my SA installation to 2.44 - grr.
may I suggest you add a note at http://spamassassin.kluge.net/RPMS/ that the
single .src there will produce the 3 binaries (for morons like me to whom
such things are
ok. I'm now running 2.60 but with same results. curiously, as with
Cheryl's problem, I mostly seem to have one user with the problem... and
from what I can tell there is nothing remarkable about that user's
account...
any help would be most appreciated.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL P
Robert Nicholson wrote:
>
> I've got a mailbox full of messages that got past SA
>
> They are all from the same spammer.
What sort of stuff is in the messages?
And if it's a bulk send -- that is, a real spammer, as opposed to
someone targeting only you (which would be, most likely, for the most
I am having a bit of a time trying to get bayes working with
qmail/qmailscanner. My server is acting like a relay server for my
domain and does not have mailboxes. Does anyone have any information
that they can share with point me in the right direction?
On Sunday 07 December 2003 22:56 CET Erick Calder wrote:
> ok. I'm now running 2.60 but with same results. curiously, as with
> Cheryl's problem, I mostly seem to have one user with the problem... and
> from what I can tell there is nothing remarkable about that user's
> account...
Are those pro
> Are those processes really zombies or does the user probably
> just receive loads of mail?
they're not really zombies since they're eating up all available cpu. and
the user doesn't get that much mail but when he does the processes run
forever.
> Have you tried limiting the number of children v
On Sunday 07 December 2003 22:56 CET Erick Calder wrote:
> ok. I'm now running 2.60 but with same results. curiously, as with
> Cheryl's problem, I mostly seem to have one user with the problem... and
> from what I can tell there is nothing remarkable about that user's
> account...
My favorite g
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 20:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Greetings all!
>
> Detailed thread is here:
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=93771&start=0&sid=5b9753497d3d65e947679654382eea37
>
> Basically, I have installed amavisd-new and SpamAssassin 2.60 on a box
> that serves as a gateway
Hmm, it looks as though this would be the problem:
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? no
debug: is DNS available? 0
Now, the next question, how do I go about installing Net::DNS, do I have to
use CPAN?
Thanks,
Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
if you're running RH you can use the RPM. see
http://perl.arix.com/cpan2rpm/#prebuilt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Richard Bewley
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 5:50 PM
To: 'David B Funk'
Cc: 'Matt Kettler'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'El
Mariposa
Title: Spam that got through question
The spam attached has the following random words at the bottom:
automata childhood reflectance trevelyan tile captious hollingsworth cornstarch chinaman chicanery
Is this to try to poison bayes or to just try and fool things to get it through or some
At 11:07 AM 12/6/03 -0800, mairhtin wrote:
Great to hear! Is xanadu.evi-inc.com *YOUR* dns machine? my machine is
named mail.techsolutionsgroupllc.com, so I suppose that the correspondant
line would be :
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail.techsolutionsgroupllc.com
since mail.techsolutio
At 08:49 PM 12/7/03 -0500, Richard Bewley wrote:
mm, it looks as though this would be the problem:
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? no
debug: is DNS available? 0
Now, the next question, how do I go about installing Net::DNS, do I have to
use CPAN?
you can do it via tarball, and most distros
At 07:15 PM 12/7/03 -0800, Scott Harris wrote:
The spam attached has the following random words at the bottom:
automata childhood reflectance trevelyan tile captious hollingsworth
cornstarch chinaman chicanery
Is this to try to poison bayes or to just try and fool things to get it
through or so
At 02:46 PM 12/7/03 -0600, Michael Satterwhite wrote:
50_scores.cf:score BAYES_80 0 0 5.300 2.862
50_scores.cf:score BAYES_90 0 0 4.027 3.002
50_scores.cf:score BAYES_99 0 0 5.200 3.008
if I'm reading this correctly more points are given for classifying a message
as 80% probable than for 90% probab
29 matches
Mail list logo
