ah!! now I get it. I _was_ running 2.60 before "upgrading" to Shriek, which actually downgraded my SA installation to 2.44 - grr.
may I suggest you add a note at http://spamassassin.kluge.net/RPMS/ that the single .src there will produce the 3 binaries (for morons like me to whom such things are not immediately evident)? -----Original Message----- From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 12:46 PM To: Erick Calder Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] report_safe ? On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 12:24:16PM -0800, Erick Calder wrote: > I've recently upgraded to Shriek which comes with 2.44. my user_prefs used > to include a line like: > report_safe 0 > in the current docs I find neither any mention of this setting nor an > alternative... wtf? report_safe was introduced in 2.50. 2.44, at this point, is ancient. You should upgrade to 2.60. If you don't want to do that, you can look at defang_mime, report_header, and use_terse_report. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush (Gov. of Texas) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
