[SAtalk] Getting error messages

I ran Spamassassin 2.30 with -t and got the following results: = Bareword found where operator expected at (eval 7) line 764, near "25FREEMEGS_URL_body_test" (Missing operator before FREEMEGS_URL_body_test?) Bareword f

RE: [SAtalk] Re: Fw: Hi, it's Nadia. please come talk with me.. I have a webcam

I can second this. Your message also received a score of 8.6 on my config (which is pretty much standard). Daz > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:spamassassin- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Derrick 'dman' Hudson > Sent: 22 June 2002 05:11 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [SAtalk] Getting error messages

I found the answer! Before installing 2.30, make sure that any garbage from a bad 2.20 install is deleted!! I cleaned out all signs of previous spam assassin installs. Then I installed 2.30 It works like a charm! ===

Re: [SAtalk] X- references in headers

Yeah, I just did a test run from my shopping cart for a message we need to send out to our customers - got a 7 out of 5 rating . SPAM: Content analysis details: (7 hits, 5 required) SPAM: X_EM2.31PRESENT (1.3 points) Found a X-EM-Version header SPAM: X_EM_REGISTRATION (1.2 points) Found a

[SAtalk] looks like "spam blocking" is getting popular -- a SAProcompetitor?

just saw this on the w2knews list I'm on [they sell software through www.sunbelt-software.com] > So I might as well throw it out to the rest of the world to hear. > We are coming out next week with a really cool anti-spam product. > It works on Outlook and Outlook Express and quarantines all thi

RE: [SAtalk] looks like "spam blocking" is getting popular -- a SAProcompetitor?

I wouldn't be surprised if they were stealing SA's rules. Not so much stealing the rules explicitly but the logic behind the rule. -Original Message- From: Robert Fleming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 5:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] looks like

Re: [SAtalk] X- references in headers

On Saturday 22 June 2002 11:58 am, Danita Zanre wrote: > I guess the 2.4 points for giving our customers a way to actually > remove themselves from our LEGITIMATE mailing list really puts us over > the top . Yes. The unsubscribe notice on Yahoo! Groups mailing lists messages gives an *4* point

[SAtalk] Incorrectly flagged as spam

This got flagged as spam by SA 2.31, on Debian unstable. Why? And what should I do to prevent such mis-flaggings in future? Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by workhorse.mike-leone.com (Postfix) with ESMTP i

[SAtalk] Grammar Issue?

Shouldn't this have the word "the" before the word future? This is from the beginning of the report. LER SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. -- Larry Rosenman http://

Re: [SAtalk] Grammar Issue?

Only if you're an American - and by the spelling of "recognize" I can only assume not! Danita >>> Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6/22/2002 8:43:29 PM >>> Shouldn't this have the word "the" before the word future? This is from the beginning of the report. LER SPAM: This mail is probably