Unfortunately the problem with SpamAssassin is that all the spam we
should be complaining to ISPs about we are simply silently accepting and
ignoring (perhaps reporting to DCC, Pyzor, Razor and Bayes...) and
/dev/null, that's it. For spammers, SA, it "only makes them stronger"
so to speak.
Maybe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Covington, Chris writes:
> Unfortunately the problem with SpamAssassin is that all the spam we
> should be complaining to ISPs about we are simply silently accepting and
> ignoring (perhaps reporting to DCC, Pyzor, Razor and Bayes...) and
> /dev/null,
At 02:04 PM 12/19/2003, Covington, Chris wrote:
Maybe it's better if we actually report the spam to ISPs instead of
sucking it up... think of all the evidence these prosecutors would have.
Maybe SA should have some kind of ISP reporting system or template.
Perhaps you might want to take a look at t
Unfortunately the problem with SpamAssassin is that all the spam we
should be complaining to ISPs about we are simply silently accepting and
ignoring (perhaps reporting to DCC, Pyzor, Razor and Bayes...) and
/dev/null, that's it. For spammers, SA, it "only makes them stronger"
so to speak.
Mayb
