Re: [SAtalk] spamd woes (was: spamd ignoring local.cf)

2002-06-26 Thread Olivier Nicole
Hi Michelle, > Actually, I'm running spamd server-wide, invoked from a main > procmailrc. In your scheme, spamd would be called only directly from So do I. > the user's .procmailrc, right? Would it still be possible to somehow > use the .no_spam_check method to opt out when using server-wi

Re: [SAtalk] spamd woes (was: spamd ignoring local.cf)

2002-06-26 Thread M. Brownsworth
> > Has the possibility of >> using the envelope headers instead been suggested to Craig Hughes? > >Not all mail system tells you what is the enveloppe. Unless your mail >system has a way to include the enveloppe inside the message headers, >then SA will not know about it. > >But if your goal is

Re: [SAtalk] spamd woes (was: spamd ignoring local.cf)

2002-06-24 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 11:20:03PM -0700, M. Brownsworth wrote: > Slap me and call me Sally if I'm wrong, but it looks to me from the > results that the "all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]" entry in > local.cf has no effect whatsoever on spamc's filtering. One good > thing: spamc doesn't die when

Re: [SAtalk] spamd woes (was: spamd ignoring local.cf)

2002-06-23 Thread M. Brownsworth
Theo Van Dinter writes: >HUPping spamd won't do anything for you, you have to fully stop/start it. >In fact, sending it a HUP causes it to die because there's no handler >for it. That's too bad. It would be useful to be able to force spamd to reread its configuration file without having to k

Re: [SAtalk] spamd woes (was: spamd ignoring local.cf)

2002-06-20 Thread Olivier Nicole
> I've -HUP'ped spamd every time local.cf has been modified. But just > for grins I killed it completely and restarted it. It came up for a > short while then died. Odd, I thought. I restarted it again with > the same result. So figuring it was time to upgrade to the latest > version, I d

Re: [SAtalk] spamd woes (was: spamd ignoring local.cf)

2002-06-20 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 02:14:34PM -0700, Michelle Brownsworth wrote: > I've -HUP'ped spamd every time local.cf has been modified. But just > for grins I killed it completely and restarted it. It came up for a > short while then died. Odd, I thought. I restarted it again with > the same res

Re: [SAtalk] spamd woes (was: spamd ignoring local.cf)

2002-06-20 Thread Michelle Brownsworth
>On Thursday, June 20, 2002, at 02:34 PM, M. Brownsworth wrote: > >>I'm running spamd 2.20 as root on a FreeBSD 4.5 server, with >>system-wide filtering. It seems to be disregarding anything in >>/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. Yesterday, I added my address as >>"all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTE