Hi Michelle,
> Actually, I'm running spamd server-wide, invoked from a main
> procmailrc. In your scheme, spamd would be called only directly from
So do I.
> the user's .procmailrc, right? Would it still be possible to somehow
> use the .no_spam_check method to opt out when using server-wi
> > Has the possibility of
>> using the envelope headers instead been suggested to Craig Hughes?
>
>Not all mail system tells you what is the enveloppe. Unless your mail
>system has a way to include the enveloppe inside the message headers,
>then SA will not know about it.
>
>But if your goal is
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 11:20:03PM -0700, M. Brownsworth wrote:
> Slap me and call me Sally if I'm wrong, but it looks to me from the
> results that the "all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]" entry in
> local.cf has no effect whatsoever on spamc's filtering. One good
> thing: spamc doesn't die when
Theo Van Dinter writes:
>HUPping spamd won't do anything for you, you have to fully stop/start it.
>In fact, sending it a HUP causes it to die because there's no handler
>for it.
That's too bad. It would be useful to be able to force spamd to
reread its configuration file without having to k
> I've -HUP'ped spamd every time local.cf has been modified. But just
> for grins I killed it completely and restarted it. It came up for a
> short while then died. Odd, I thought. I restarted it again with
> the same result. So figuring it was time to upgrade to the latest
> version, I d
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 02:14:34PM -0700, Michelle Brownsworth wrote:
> I've -HUP'ped spamd every time local.cf has been modified. But just
> for grins I killed it completely and restarted it. It came up for a
> short while then died. Odd, I thought. I restarted it again with
> the same res
>On Thursday, June 20, 2002, at 02:34 PM, M. Brownsworth wrote:
>
>>I'm running spamd 2.20 as root on a FreeBSD 4.5 server, with
>>system-wide filtering. It seems to be disregarding anything in
>>/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. Yesterday, I added my address as
>>"all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTE