Re: [SAtalk] spamd error message

2003-05-27 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 02:19:02PM -0400, Dave Stern - Former Rocket Scientist wrote: > unix passed to setlogsock, but path not available at /sausr/bin/spamd line 207 As I recall, it's some error with certain versions of Sys::Syslog. On my mail server I saw that error (I use spampd to interface w

Re: Red Hat 8.0 perl borked? (was Re: [SAtalk] spamd error message from logs )

2002-10-24 Thread Hippo Man
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:24:51PM -0400, Aram Mirzadeh wrote: > > There is a bug report and a work around (for perl) on the bugzilla site: > > Bug# 1147 > > If you still need the fix. > > Aram Thanks for this reference. It mainly talks about a RedHat workaround, however. The workaround tal

Re: Red Hat 8.0 perl borked? (was Re: [SAtalk] spamd error message from logs )

2002-10-24 Thread Hippo Man
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:12:52PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote: > > (cc'ed to ILUG) > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > On RedHat 8.0, perl 5.8, SA 2.43 I get this error message often in my logs: > > > > Oct 24 13:37:09 blacktip spamd[24511]: Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected > > continuation b

Red Hat 8.0 perl borked? (was Re: [SAtalk] spamd error message from logs )

2002-10-24 Thread Justin Mason
(cc'ed to ILUG) [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > On RedHat 8.0, perl 5.8, SA 2.43 I get this error message often in my logs: > > Oct 24 13:37:09 blacktip spamd[24511]: Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected > continuation byte 0xa0, with no preceding start byte) in transliteration (tr/ > //) > at /usr/