Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime is now report_safe but.......

2003-07-18 Thread Matt Kettler
At 01:38 PM 7/18/2003 -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote: Sorry for the repost, but trying to get this all figured out. Now that i know defang_mime has evolved into "report_safe 2", does anybody know how to get the defang capabilities without SA actaully putting a report in the email? You might be able t

Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime in 2.55

2003-07-18 Thread Adam Denenberg
nging". So is there a way to get the mimedefang feature of report_safe 2 withouth the SA report ? thanks adam - Original Message - From: "Bob Apthorpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 12:22 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] de

Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime in 2.55

2003-07-16 Thread Bob Apthorpe
Hi, On 16 Jul 2003 11:08:57 -0400 Adam Denenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is defang_mime still an option in 2.55 ? Can it be placed in sql table > for user prefs? > > I am getting the following error in 2.55 > > : debug: retrieving prefs for [EMAIL PROTECTED] from SQL server > > Jul 16

Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime in 2.55

2003-07-16 Thread Adam Denenberg
would i be correct in saying report_safe 2 does what i remember defang_mime to do? (strips out html and converts email to text). I dont want any extra reports added to the email . thanks adam On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 11:59, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 11:08:57AM -0400, Adam

Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime in 2.55

2003-07-16 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 11:08:57AM -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote: > is defang_mime still an option in 2.55 ? Can it be placed in sql table > for user prefs? nope. look at "report_safe". -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "I love drag queens, you can take 'em to dinner and then dancing, and if you g

Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime

2002-12-06 Thread Matthew Davis
* Ronan Lucio ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > #== > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > whitelist_to[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > defang_mime 0 > use_terse_report1 > report_header

RE: [SAtalk] defang_mime doesn't work

2002-09-24 Thread Cindi Ma
-a Linux red3 2.4.18-3 #1 Thu Apr 18 07:37:53 EDT 2002 i686 unknown -Original Message- From: Kevin Gagel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 1:32 PM To: Cindi Ma Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime doesn't work Have you res

Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime doesn't work

2002-09-24 Thread Kevin Gagel
Have you restarted spamd? You'll need to, to make the change active. I'm using 2.41 and previously 2.x with this feature, and no problems. > Cindi Ma wrote: > > Hi, all > > Since users like to keep the Embedded HTML in their e-mails, I have been > trying to make defang_mime working. But there i

Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime

2002-07-03 Thread Justin R. Miller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Said Pete O'Hara on Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 02:42:30PM -0400: > I understand what defang_mime is doing at the surface level - - > change the Content-type: header of suspected spam to ``text/plain''. > And I have read rfc1521 which describes the differe

Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime

2002-07-03 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 02:42:30PM -0400, Pete O'Hara wrote: > I understand what defang_mime is doing at the surface level - >- change the Content-type: header of suspected spam to > ``text/plain''. And I have read rfc1521 which describes the different > content types: text, multipart, appli