and noticed that the tagging configuration is specified twice, once in
amavisd.conf, and again in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. There
doesn't seem to be any reason as to why one setting is specified in one
place, and and not the other. What is the point of specifying settings
in the local.cf,
On 8/29/03 2:51 AM, "Jon Fraley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to get Spamassassin 2.55, spamass-milter-0.2.0 and
> sendmail-8.11.6-26.72 running with Red Hat AS 2.1. I have installed
> everything and have started all process, however no emails are being
> sent through S
This is only to scan incoming local mail. Actually the server will set
between a virus appliance and our email server.
Jon
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 14:30, AltGrendel wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 13:51, Jon Fraley wrote:
> > I am trying to get Spamassassin 2.55, spamass-milter-0.2.0 and
> > sendm
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 13:51, Jon Fraley wrote:
> I am trying to get Spamassassin 2.55, spamass-milter-0.2.0 and
> sendmail-8.11.6-26.72 running with Red Hat AS 2.1. I have installed
> everything and have started all process, however no emails are being
> sent through SA. Spamd is running and ther
At 10:35 AM 7/17/2003 -0500, Miguel Vazquez wrote:
I need help about how i can configurated the SpamAssassin that block all
recipients that be spam, and not have problems with others emails.
Any person have one configuration existing?
(if my installation is on root).
That's the perfect ideal, but
Scott Rothgaber wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:38:57 -0400:
> bayes: no dbs present, cannot scan: /etc/mail/bayes_toks
>
> Do I need to initiali[zs]e the database, like `vacation -i'?
>
no, check the path, is it "/etc/mail/bayes" in your local.cf? You actually
may want it to write to /etc/mail/sp
