Nice feature! I'll add this to SA itself.
C
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 10:06, Mark Roedel wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:05 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [SAtalk] Score l
I'm not sure I've ever seen a non-spam message with a score higher than
10. There are a few 10's in the nonspam corpus, but no 11s or higher.
C
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 08:05, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> I am wanting to define SA scores based on filter sensitivity terms like
> High, Medi
> -Original Message-
> From: CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Score levels
>
>
> I am wanting to define SA scores based on filter sensitivity
> terms like High, Medium, and
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> I am wanting to define SA scores based on filter sensitivity terms like
> High, Medium, and Low where High would be the most agressive blocking of
> Spam to Low which is the most lenient. This would be easier for my
> customers to unders
