Re: [SAtalk] removing SpamAssassin headers before processing message

2003-08-22 Thread Rich Puhek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a problem with SpamAssassin where it would get (from postfix) an email sent by someone on the internet, and that email already have a X-Spam-Flag: YES and all the other SpamAssassin headers before I do my own SpamAssassin tests. How can I remove all SpamAssa

RE: [SAtalk] removing SpamAssassin headers before processing mess age

2003-08-22 Thread stephane . schitter
Larry, I would not want to use it because the tagged spam is not actually on a real spam... It's a false positive as the required_hits was set to 2.0 !!! It would not be tagged as spam by my own installation. Regards, Stephane   I am not sure, but I think that SA will remove SA markups by de

RE: [SAtalk] removing SpamAssassin headers before processing message

2003-08-22 Thread Larry Gilson
I am not sure, but I think that SA will remove SA markups by default. You could use the following before calling spamc or spamassassin: :0 w * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes | formail -I X-Spam-Status: Yes However, if you already have an X-Spam-Status: Yes, why not just use it and save yourself the cycles?

Re: [SAtalk] Removing SpamAssassin

2003-02-24 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Bob Apthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One nice thing about the old body report was exactly that - it broke the > HTML content. Very nice for HTML-only garbage read under Pegasus Mail, > which renders HTML-only as HTML[1] whether you want it to or not. > Corrupting the HTML body fooled Pegasus

Re: [SAtalk] Removing SpamAssassin

2003-02-23 Thread Bob Apthorpe
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 09:57:18 +1300 Simon Byrnand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 14:31 21/02/03 +0100, you wrote: > >Simon Byrnand wrote on Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:11:20 +1300: > > > > > If this option is set to 0, incoming spam is only modified by > > > adding some headers and no changes will be > >

Re: [SAtalk] Removing SpamAssassin

2003-02-18 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "SpamTalk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:22 PM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Removing SpamAssassin > Why is this not in the FAQ with a big bold hyperlink on the home page? Off the top

Re: [SAtalk] Removing SpamAssassin

2003-02-18 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Tony Earnshaw wrote on 18 Feb 2003 22:36:13 +0100: > Christmas, New Year's Eve ;-) And you forgot to mention the tiger fur on the floor ... > And in > Germany. > It was made in Germany, AFAIR! Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.cona

Re: [SAtalk] Removing SpamAssassin

2003-02-18 Thread Tony L. Svanstrom
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 the voices made Susan Civil-Brown write: SC> I never downloaded SpamAssassin, so I don't know what it's doing on my SC> computer. I certainly don't need it as I have a good spam program, and SC> SpamAssassin tends to screw up messages that have to do with putting things SC> on

RE: [SAtalk] Removing SpamAssassin

2003-02-18 Thread SpamTalk
Robert J. Strickler Sr. Consultant Net56 1266 W. Northwest Hwy. Suite 740 Palatine, IL 60067 -Original Message- From: Malte S. Stretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Susan Civil-Brown Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Removing