RE: [SAtalk] Rejecting Spam at Sendmail

2002-02-25 Thread Craig Hughes
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 25 February 2002 15:56 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Rejecting Spam at Sendmail > > > > > > Sendmail has a discard mailer, but the subject filter I have > > in place rejects messages, rather than disc

Re: [SAtalk] Rejecting Spam at Sendmail

2002-02-25 Thread Mike Grau
Sorry, I forgot to mention ... When rejecting a message, it doesn't really matter what the reply-to address is - the bounce will go to the mail host that sent the message which of course does exist or I wouldn't have gotten the message in the first place. The reply-to is in the message headers.

RE: [SAtalk] Rejecting Spam at Sendmail

2002-02-25 Thread Tony Hoyle
> -Original Message- > From: Mike Grau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 25 February 2002 15:56 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Rejecting Spam at Sendmail > > > Sendmail has a discard mailer, but the subject filter I have > in place re

Re: [SAtalk] Rejecting Spam at Sendmail

2002-02-25 Thread Mike Grau
Sendmail has a discard mailer, but the subject filter I have in place rejects messages, rather than discarding them. I suppose it could be written to use the discard mailer (but I am not a programmer), but why do you prefer to blackhole rather than rejecting the message? I could accept and then

RE: [SAtalk] Rejecting Spam at Sendmail

2002-02-25 Thread Tony Hoyle
> -Original Message- > From: Mike Grau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 22 February 2002 20:16 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Rejecting Spam at Sendmail > > > Hello > > I am thinking about using Sendmail/Spamass-Milter/SpamAssassin > to reject mail at the Sendmail level b