Yeah, the only hope would be to do this during the SMTP conversation,
and return an SMTP error code instead of accepting the message or
something.  Not straightforward.

C

On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 08:08, Tony Hoyle wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Grau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 25 February 2002 15:56
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Rejecting Spam at Sendmail
> > 
> > 
> > Sendmail has a discard mailer, but the subject filter I have
> > in place rejects messages, rather than discarding them. I suppose
> > it could be written to use the discard mailer (but I am not a 
> > programmer), but why do you prefer to blackhole rather than 
> > rejecting the message? I could accept and then black hole messages 
> > from places that are attemptng to use me as an open relay also, 
> > but the usual practice is to just not allow it.
> > 
> Often the place to reject to doesn't exist, so you'll just waste CPU
> cycles and bandwidth that could be better used elsewhere.  Even when
> it does exist, it could be an innocent victim who gets flooded by the
> reject messages.
> 
> Tony
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to