Sorry, I forgot to mention ... When rejecting a message, it doesn't really matter what the reply-to address is - the bounce will go to the mail host that sent the message which of course does exist or I wouldn't have gotten the message in the first place.
The reply-to is in the message headers. The bounce uses the envelope headers. Tony Hoyle wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mike Grau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 22 February 2002 20:16 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [SAtalk] Rejecting Spam at Sendmail > > > > > > Hello > > > > I am thinking about using Sendmail/Spamass-Milter/SpamAssassin > > to reject mail at the Sendmail level based on the Subject > > (****SPAM****) or the X-Spam-Flag rather accepting all the > > junk that SA flags as SPAM. However I do not want to return > > to the spammers all the information given in the X-Spam_Status > > header. Is there any harm in commenting out in PerMsgStatus.pm: > > > There's not much point in bouncing spam as 99% of it has a forged > reply address anyway... can't sendmail be configured to just blackhole > it? > > Tony _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
