Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamc/spamd questions

2002-07-06 Thread Olivier Nicole
Hi, > Yes, spamd indicates that a connection was made from localhost, but > there's no followup log entry for the virtual domain addresses; email > to me generates 'clean message' or 'identified spam' followups, but not > so for the virtual users. Just one question, are you sure that your virtua

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamc/spamd questions

2002-07-05 Thread Eric S. Theise
Bart Schaefer writes: > Last time you wrote, I got the impression you weren't getting any procmail > log output. Oh, that was when you were writing to the procmail list ... > sometimes it gets a little confusing to read both lists. You wrote: Yeah, initially I traced my problems to procmail, bu

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamc/spamd questions

2002-07-05 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Eric S. Theise wrote: > Besides, if spamc is called for all incoming mail to any domain -- the > procmail log shows that that's so -- doesn't that suggest that the global > procmailrc file isn't being ignored, but that someting is breaking down > between spamc and spamd? Last

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamc/spamd questions

2002-07-05 Thread Eric S. Theise
Derrick 'dman' Hudson writes: > If your sendmail setup is anything like the one someone with a Raq > recently posted, then you need to put that recipe in the procmailrc > for each virtual domain. The setup ignores the global procmailrc for > virtual domains. I've worked on RaQs, and although the