Vivek Khera wrote:
>> "r" == rOD writes:
>
> r> Vivek Khera wrote:
>>> But how many of those were scoring 5 or more to be flagged as spam
>>> as well?
>
> r> [rod@blazing masses]$ cat nonspam-rODbegbie.log | grep ^Y | grep
> PORN | wc r> 197 788 40835
>
> r> So, about 4% of my non-
> "r" == rOD writes:
r> Vivek Khera wrote:
>> But how many of those were scoring 5 or more to be flagged as spam as
>> well?
r> [rod@blazing masses]$ cat nonspam-rODbegbie.log | grep ^Y | grep PORN | wc
r> 197 788 40835
r> So, about 4% of my non-spam matches a PRON rule.
And SA
Vivek Khera wrote:
> But how many of those were scoring 5 or more to be flagged as spam as
> well?
[rod@blazing masses]$ cat nonspam-rODbegbie.log | grep ^Y | grep PORN | wc
197 788 40835
So, about 4% of my non-spam matches a PRON rule.
rOD.
--
Before Stonehenge, there was Woodhenge
> "r" == rOD writes:
r> Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
>> Right, his rule would only trigger if SA had already decided it was
>> SPAM. So it's not *that* bad. I wonder how often you'd see PORN
>> rules triggered in non-porn spam. That's the only problem, right?
r> Quite often, I'm afraid.POR
Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> Right, his rule would only trigger if SA had already decided it was
> SPAM. So it's not *that* bad. I wonder how often you'd see PORN
> rules triggered in non-porn spam. That's the only problem, right?
Quite often, I'm afraid.PORN_* matches 753/4129 of my nonspam co
> Only PORN_8 is negatively scoring. (Severely negative)
PORN_* means PORN_8 of course, just a problem of synch on the shift
key :))
Olivier
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Veg
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 09:11:33AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> > | For certain items, e.g. porn, I would like to send
> > | these to /dev/null.
> >
> > :0
> > * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> > * ^X-Spam-Status:.*PORN
> > /dev/null
>
> Be carefull!, rule PORN_* is a negative rule (it triggers on email
> | For certain items, e.g. porn, I would like to send
> | these to /dev/null.
>
> :0
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> * ^X-Spam-Status:.*PORN
> /dev/null
Be carefull!, rule PORN_* is a negative rule (it triggers on email
that are not porn).
Olivier
___
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 09:40:14PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 05:01:24PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 05:39:28PM -0400, Don Bivens wrote:
> >
> > | For certain items, e.g. porn, I would like to send
> > | these to /dev/null.
> >
> >
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 05:01:24PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 05:39:28PM -0400, Don Bivens wrote:
>
> | For certain items, e.g. porn, I would like to send
> | these to /dev/null.
>
> :0
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> * ^X-Spam-Status:.*PORN
> /dev/null
>
> (IOW, if
Thanks very much.
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -
http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink
___
Spamas
11 matches
Mail list logo
