> On Friday 29 August 2003 04:34 CET Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 01:57:27PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
>> > Fixed now, but the second part of Theo's fix (assuming he did it :)
>> > doesn't seem to be in there - using any \n's to add a newline into a
>> > report header still e
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
>
>> to make it work like before (or make a symlink from /usr/local/etc to
>> /etc).
>> See also bug 2374 [1].
>
>> [1]http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2374
>
> Ah. Reading through the suggestions on Bugzilla - having everything in
> /us
> On Friday 29 August 2003 17:02 CET Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
>> Is there a build switch to tell spamc to use a Unix doimain socket (and
>> the socket name) by default ?
>
> Nope.
>
>> Also, for some reason on rc3, perl Makefile.PL built a system that was
>> looking in /usr/local/etc/spamas
"Henrik Schmiediche" writes:
>
> I would like to second the notion that having to specify SYSCONFDIR
>is going to cause sys-admins problems that do not follow this list. I
>have no problem with the idea in principle; I just think it needs to be
>well documented, preferable with a run-time-instal
: Re: [SAtalk] Re: SpamAssassin 2.60 rc3 released
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> to make it work like before (or make a symlink from /usr/local/etc to
/etc).
> See also bug 2374 [1].
> [1]http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2374
Ah. Reading through the sugge
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> to make it work like before (or make a symlink from /usr/local/etc to /etc).
> See also bug 2374 [1].
> [1]http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2374
Ah. Reading through the suggestions on Bugzilla - having everything in
/usr/local/etc may
