*snip*
> > for free on our own in our spare time?
>
> I agree with you Fred that there's plenty to criticize about that
> article, but your last paragraph is not one of them. For the vast
> majority of people it is well worth $10-20 per month for spam and
> virus protection. Most people would muc
Nancy McGough wrote:
On 24 Nov 2003 Fred ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[...]
SpamAssassin 2.4 is really out-dated, it's missing Bayes and thousands of
other fixes that make it a better product.
I had a good laugh on your article, you say "Spend the 10 or 20 per month
per year for one of the commerci
