> >Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 04:20:56 +0300 (IDT)
> >Date-warning: Date header was inserted by mxout2.netvision.net.il
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler
> At 05:31 PM 8/30/03 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>
> >why?
>
> Can you name a single nonspam mail sender who doesn't have a
> D
Hi Justin,
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Mason
> > > Can you name a single nonspam mail sender who doesn't have a
> > > Date: header in the message when he delivers it to the MTA?
> > >
> > > No message-id is somewhat common for mass mailings (spam or
> > > nonspam) but I've never
Matt Kettler wrote on Sun, 31 Aug 2003 00:21:05 -0400:
> No message-id is somewhat common for mass mailings (spam or nonspam)
>
yes, but a
Date-warning: Date header was inserted by mxout2.netvision.net.il
??? How many mails bear this header?
Also, many formmailers don't insert a Date but let th
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 05:31 PM 8/30/03 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>
> >why?
>
> Can you name a single nonspam mail sender who doesn't have a Date:
> header in the message when he delivers it to the MTA?
A friend of mine is using some sort of MUA on her Mac systems that
d
At 05:31 PM 8/30/03 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
why?
Can you name a single nonspam mail sender who doesn't have a Date: header
in the message when he delivers it to the MTA?
No message-id is somewhat common for mass mailings (spam or nonspam) but
I've never seen a nonspam that was also missing a
Carlo Wood wrote on Sat, 30 Aug 2003 13:44:07 +0200:
> I think there should be a test on the latter header entry
> that adds extra points.
>
why?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.w
