Matt Kettler wrote on Sun, 31 Aug 2003 00:21:05 -0400: > No message-id is somewhat common for mass mailings (spam or nonspam) >
yes, but a Date-warning: Date header was inserted by mxout2.netvision.net.il ??? How many mails bear this header? Also, many formmailers don't insert a Date but let the MTA do it. So, a lot of MTA-inserted mail isn't spam or bulk mail or unsolicited at all. On the other hand, if MTAs started to add a warning header to all external inbound or relayed mail (which would stop adding it for local formmailers) spammers would possibly add this ASAP, or not? So, it's not a good indicator at the moment because of quantity and it won't be one in the long run because spammers would adopt if gets used by more mTAs. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
