-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 02 January 2004 18:59, Jack Gostl wrote:
> > On Friday 02 January 2004 17:26, Jack Gostl wrote:
> > > This is really more of a procmail question, but its part of the process.
> > >
> > > If I spot a certain string in the subject line, I'd li
> -Original Message-
> From: Jack Gostl
> Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 7:00 PM
> To: Douglas Kirkland
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] procmail
>
>
>
> > On Friday 02 January 2004 17:26, Jack Gostl wrote:
> > > This is really
> On Friday 02 January 2004 17:26, Jack Gostl wrote:
> > This is really more of a procmail question, but its part of the process.
> >
> > If I spot a certain string in the subject line, I'd like to stop the
> > process and let the mail through without invoking spamassassin. Can anyone
> > clue me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 02 January 2004 17:26, Jack Gostl wrote:
> This is really more of a procmail question, but its part of the process.
>
> If I spot a certain string in the subject line, I'd like to stop the
> process and let the mail through without invoking
> I want to backup my incoming mail before sending it
> to spamassasin. I have made the following .procmailrc.
>
> :0 c:
> backup
>
> :0fw: spamassassin.lock
> * < 256000
> | spamassassin
>
> Can someone tell if this is fine.
Looks good. See 'man procmailex' for this and other examples.
...g
Peter Rosa wrote:
Hello list's friends.
I'm sorry for writting same message third time, but please be patient with
me - I have about 200 spam messages a day so I REALLY need to block them.
You'd probably have more luck un a procmail list, since that's where
your problem really lies. That sai
orris Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter Rosa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Procmail+Sendmail+SpamAssassin
> There's an example procmailrc in the spamassassin package. Look for
> procmailrc.example.
Hi Dan,
Is it possible that this file was created on a Windows host and then moved
into the user's home? I have seen this happen if the .procmailrc file is
either corrupt or if it has control characters, like a line return, that was
not produced in a *nix format.
--Larry
> -Original Messag
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 20:06, Mike Burger wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Gary Funck wrote:
>
> > > I have a feeleing that my ~/.procmailrc files are being skipped, it
> > > seems that email being delivered via fetchmail, is not following the
> > > rules in these files. Is there anyway, to force fetc
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Gary Funck wrote:
> > I have a feeleing that my ~/.procmailrc files are being skipped, it
> > seems that email being delivered via fetchmail, is not following the
> > rules in these files. Is there anyway, to force fetchmail to send all
> > mail it collects to procmail?
> >
>
On 13 Aug 2003, Angel Gabriel wrote:
> > Something else to check is in his /etc/postfix/main.cf file. He'll have
> > to make sure that postfix is configured to actually use procmail as the
> > lcoal delivery agent by setting:
> >
> > mailbox_command = /usr/bin/procmail
> >
> > Otherwise, post
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Angel
> Gabriel
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:39 AM
> To: Spam Assassin
> Subject: [SAtalk] Procmail files being skipped?
>
>
> I have a feeleing that my ~/.procmailrc files are being skipped, it
> se
> -Original Message-
> From: Shane Hickey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Howdy all,
Howdy Shane! A good procmail book is "The Procmail Companion" by Martin
McCarthy.
> | spamassassin -e
I could be wrong but I don't think you are limited to this. I'll attempt
this but just looking a
> -Original Message-
> From: Shane Hickey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Howdy all,
Howdy Shane! A good procmail book is "The Procmail Companion" by Martin
McCarthy.
> | spamassassin -e
I could be wrong but I don't think you are limited to this. I'll attempt
this but just looking a
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 11:43:31AM -0500, Chris Barnes is rumored to have said:
>
> I need a simple procmail script so that any messages marked as spam by
> SA get put into a folder named "Filtered" (I use IMAP, so using the MUA
> is not an option).
>
Here's the procmail stuff I use for SA:
###
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 02:49:10PM -0700, Patrick Murphy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running Spamasssassin / Spamass-Milter on Solaris 8 with Sendmail
> 8.12.9. I want to be able to have identified spam placed in a per user
> spam file without the spam appearing in the users Inbox.
>
> I understand th
> -Original Message-
> From: Jose M. Herrera
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:22 PM
>
> Why is necesary put DROPPRIVS=yes in /etc/procmailrc ???
>
> What is DROPPRIVS for?
From "man procmailrc":
DROPPRIVS If set to `yes' procmail will drop all privileges it
might
From
http://web.bilkent.edu.tr/mirrors/Sendmail/www.wolfenet.com/%257Ejhardin/procmail-security.html:
Note that the DROPPRIVS at the beginning means the log file must be writable
by the recipient.
Thomas
- Original Message -
From: "Jose M.Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hey, Joe.
I am doing almost the same thing, except I hand off the email to
GroupWise.
Rather than use Sendmail which has just had another major security hole
published, I use postfix. The configuration is much simpler and there
is a great paper on integrating postfix with SA. Now if I could jus
I have spamassassin setup in a sitewide config using RH71, SendMail and
ProcMail, all installed via RPM's.
I configured /etc/procmail as follows:
LOGDATE=`date +\%m\%d\%Y`
LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail/PROCmAIL.LOG.$LOGDATE
:0fw
| /usr/local/bin/spamc
I check the log file and I do see the message
Hi Jim,
I'm new to SA, but I /do/ know a bit about procmail. I think the "c" flag
will help you out here:
:0fw
| spamassassin -P
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
caughtspam
:0 c
!wireless@address
...The c flag copies the message. So the action
line--"!wireless@address"--is enacted on the origin
At 06/23/2002 08:17, Jim Howard wrote:
>What I'd like to do is modify this rule so that it sends good mail to my
>inbox, but also forwards it to another internet address, namely that of my
>wireless device.
Hi Jim,
Add something like this to the end:
:0 c
! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beware, how
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 11:17:40AM -0500, Jim Howard wrote:
> What I'd like to do is modify this rule so that it sends good mail to my
> inbox, but also forwards it to another internet address, namely that of my
> wireless device.
At the end of your .procmailrc, add the following:
:0c
[EMAIL PRO
Doug --
...and then Doug Dempsey said...
%
% If I am running qmail, do I still need to install procmail to have
% spamassassin work??
Not necessarily :-)
If you want SA to run on all mail, you can tell qmail to run messages
through SA as part of the processing. If you only want it for a user
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 10:16:11AM -0500, Brian wrote:
| Got SA working well, killer app, Thanks!
|
| I'm sending all spam to an account designed just for spam, where mail is
| looked over for any false positives(?).
...
| I'm thinking I don't even need to clutter my "eye-balling" in this mailbo
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Brian wrote:
> I can use some help with a recipe or any suggestion to accomplish (hopr
> you get the idea here)...
> :0
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> {B
> * ^SPAM: Hit! (3.0 points) Listed in Razor*
> /dev/null
> }
> {B
> * ^SPAM: Hit! (2.0 points) Received via a relay in
>Someone suggested doing an alias in /etc/mail/aliases that looked
>like this:
>
>spam:"|/usr/bin/spamassassin -r"
>
>I keep getting a procmail error that says "unknown user". I am doing
>"newaliases" in between each modification.
before the message is handed to procmail for delivery, it mus
> Thank you, this works beautifully. I had failed to mention that
> I did have
> the seek patch already too. :-)
>
> Now to get the SQL implementation going with my modified spamc
> and a quick CGI
> for the users to turn on/off their filtering. Oh yes, and a cron
> job so that
> we only keep t
> I have been using this for about a week now and it works fine.
Thank you, this works beautifully. I had failed to mention that I did have
the seek patch already too. :-)
Now to get the SQL implementation going with my modified spamc and a quick CGI
for the users to turn on/off their filter
> First make sure you have added the "seek.diff" patch to vpopmail so that
> vdeliver can accept multiple pipes. Next change bottom of procmailrc to:
>
Forgot to mention the link to the vpopmail seek patch:
http://www.thesafebox.com/
Here is the discussion regarding it:
http://bluedot.net/m
> I'm setting up another mail system and I'd like to be able to deliver the
> site-wide spam to a single maildir, while letting everything else get
> delivered by vpopmail.
>
> So far I've been unsuccessful because Procmail seems to want to
> either deliver
> everything or nothing; it doesn't (or
31 matches
Mail list logo
