On Oct 1, 2003 at 12:02, VonEssen, John wrote:
>Given your info, I am still confused why this test is in SA with a
>significant score. Tons of people legitimately relay to mails hosts that
>are off their network:
>
>- people who use a third party hosting company for @theirdomain.com
>email
This i
his test is significant. Especially with
> the release of 2.60 it seems there are more and more RBL's. Its tough to
> keep track of what does what, and how significant each one is in
> reality.
>
> -John
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAI
RBL's. Its tough to
keep track of what does what, and how significant each one is in
reality.
-John
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:21 AM
To: VonEssen, John; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] dynablock confusion..
;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] dynablock confusion...
> First, most of your message has a lot of misconceptions about dynablock,
> and SA's use of it. It's also very long so, I'm just going to leave it
out,
> and
First, most of your message has a lot of misconceptions about dynablock,
and SA's use of it. It's also very long so, I'm just going to leave it out,
and reply to your points of confusion free-form.
Dynablock does not block spamsources. It lists the IPs of dialups,
cablemodems, and DSL, regardle
