SpamTalk said the following on 24/10/02 19:44:
Would the delivery time of day be a useful value for nudging the score for
spam. Is there an easy way to test this in the GA?
It's been tested. Basically spam arrives fairly consistently throughout
the day, whereas your regular email tends to be du
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, SpamTalk wrote:
> Would the delivery time of day be a useful value for nudging the score
> for
> spam.
???
I don't think so. I write most of my personal email at nights whereas
emails sent from offices will mostly be sent during
No need to actually run the GA.. a simple mass-check would be enough to see
if the S/O was reasonable. If you have a corpus (ie: a pile of spam and
nonspam in unix mbox format) check the masses directory of the SA tarball.
I suspect against my corpus it will be horrid since some of the mailing
At Thu Oct 24 19:44:37 2002, SpamTalk wrote:
>
> Would the delivery time of day be a useful value for nudging the score for
> spam. Is there an easy way to test this in the GA?
It would be a poor move for those of us who don't have 24/7
connectivity for their mailservers. My mail is delivered by
2002 2:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] TOD score for SPAM
At Thu Oct 24 19:44:37 2002, SpamTalk wrote:
>
> Would the delivery time of day be a useful value for nudging the score
> for spam. Is there an easy way to test this in the GA?
It would be
