On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:16:47PM -0600, Michael Moncur wrote:
> Hey, cool. How did your reported spam end up in MySQL? Any chance you can
> share the script that's doing that?
;) I just posted a message about it (under the "high spam score"
thread...) It's just some perl I threw together.
--
> mysql> select COUNT(*) from reported where date > '2002-06-26
> 00:00:00' and rules like
> '%RAZOR_CHECK%';
Hey, cool. How did your reported spam end up in MySQL? Any chance you can
share the script that's doing that?
--
michael moncur mgm at starlingtech.com http://www.starlingtech.com/
"
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 06:42:15PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> although I seem to recall some questions on the razor list about Razor
> matching anything, and I haven't seen many hits in the past few days,
> but I haven't had any time to investigate, myself :(
Well:
mysql> select COUNT(*) from
Theo Van Dinter said:
> Originally the statement was "Razor2 support is a big change, we
> should wait for 2.4", and now it's "2.4 will take a while, we should
> release 2.32." The semi-software engineer in me says we should leave
> 2.3[1-9] as maintenance releases and wait for 2.40 for R2 supp
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 04:58:27AM -0700, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Is the concensus that Razor2 is stable enough for us to release
> it? I'm somewhat wary of releasing a SA version with Razor2
> support and having to answer daily emails where the answer is
> "upgrade to version 2.x -- prior versi
Is the concensus that Razor2 is stable enough for us to release
it? I'm somewhat wary of releasing a SA version with Razor2
support and having to answer daily emails where the answer is
"upgrade to version 2.x -- prior versions are buggy". In the 2
weeks I was gone, have things settled down
I'm sure we could live with that, too.
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:03:57PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> >
> >>Aaahhh...well, then. Is there any idication of when the current CVS will
> >>be release ready?
> >
> >
> > Good
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:03:57PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
>
>>Aaahhh...well, then. Is there any idication of when the current CVS will
>>be release ready?
>
>
> Good question. I haven't seen anything on the list about a planned 2.40
> release date yet. Hopefully
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:03:57PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> Aaahhh...well, then. Is there any idication of when the current CVS will
> be release ready?
Good question. I haven't seen anything on the list about a planned 2.40
release date yet. Hopefully soon. :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagl
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:48:06PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> > Razor Agents 2.08 is what's reporting when I do a razor-check. I believe
> > that's equivalent to Razor2, no?
>
> Yes, that's Razor2, which is currently not supported by a released
> S
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:48:06PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> Razor Agents 2.08 is what's reporting when I do a razor-check. I believe
> that's equivalent to Razor2, no?
Yes, that's Razor2, which is currently not supported by a released
SpamAssassin. (it's available via CVS...) Currently rel
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:27:13PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> > What, if anything, do I need to do to get it to check against the Razor
> > databases, as I'm under the impression that it is supposed to do?
>
> It should just work. What does "spamas
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:27:13PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> What, if anything, do I need to do to get it to check against the Razor
> databases, as I'm under the impression that it is supposed to do?
It should just work. What does "spamassassin -P -D< message" tell you?
Does it say Razor is
13 matches
Mail list logo
