Re: [SAtalk] SAProxy

2003-06-08 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Jack Gostl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I notice that SAProxy uses version 2.52 of SA. It looks like SA and its > tests are internal to SAProxy. Is there a way to get it to upgrade? No, but magic 8-ball says "new version based on SA 2.55 real soon now". Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-08 Thread Jack Gostl
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Dan McDonald wrote: > Jack Gostl writes: > > >> Yup - download the source and perform a manual install, just like > >> you did with pop3proxy. Better documentation on how to do this is > >> needed. > > > > Where do I get that? > > There's no source package just yet, but you

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-08 Thread Stuart Gall
- Original Message - From: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Dan McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Stuart Gall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "SpamAssassin listserve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 11:00 PM

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-08 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Jack Gostl wrote on Sun, 8 Jun 2003 07:03:26 -0400 (EDT): > Where can I get the current one? I went to the spamassassin.org page and > wind up directed to an obsolete page, which in turn directs me to a page > that says pop3proxy is obsolete and has been replaced with SAProxy, which > utilized "Ut

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-08 Thread Dan McDonald
Jack Gostl writes: >> Yup - download the source and perform a manual install, just like >> you did with pop3proxy. Better documentation on how to do this is >> needed. > > Where do I get that? There's no source package just yet, but you can check out the individual files via anonymous CVS from t

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-08 Thread Jack Gostl
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Jack Gostl wrote on Sat, 7 Jun 2003 22:32:05 -0400 (EDT): > > > I've got pop3proxy from a site called perlmonk. Not sure if its > > "official" > > > > That's the old name of SAproxy, you shouldn't use it, it's possibly an old > version. Where can I get

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-08 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Jack Gostl wrote on Sat, 7 Jun 2003 22:32:05 -0400 (EDT): > I've got pop3proxy from a site called perlmonk. Not sure if its > "official" > That's the old name of SAproxy, you shouldn't use it, it's possibly an old version. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Intern

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-07 Thread Jack Gostl
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Dan McDonald wrote: > Stuart Gall writes: > > > Is SA Proxy different to pop3proxy ? I use pop3proxy very > > successfully with windoze clients. > > SAProxy is the new name for pop3proxy. It's available as a binary > build, and the source is now in CVS. > > Jack Gostl writ

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-07 Thread Jack Gostl
> Yup - download the source and perform a manual install, just like you > did with pop3proxy. Better documentation on how to do this is needed. Where do I get that? Thanks. -- Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sp

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-07 Thread Dan McDonald
Stuart Gall writes: > Is SA Proxy different to pop3proxy ? I use pop3proxy very > successfully with windoze clients. SAProxy is the new name for pop3proxy. It's available as a binary build, and the source is now in CVS. Jack Gostl writes: > I installed SAProxy have it working, and its not bad

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-06 Thread Jack Gostl
> > I'm trying to get SAProxy working. According to the docs, I should point > > my OE at 127.0.0.1, and then change my account to > > "account_name:server". After I do this, I'm getting authentication > > failures. I looked in my server log, and did some traces and I find that > > the account is

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-06 Thread Stuart Gall
- Original Message - From: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "SpamAssassin listserve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 8:34 AM Subject: [SAtalk] SAproxy > > I'm trying to get SAProxy working. According to the docs, I should point > my OE at 127.0.0.1, and then change

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-06 Thread Tim Litwiller
: Jack Gostl Cc: SpamAssassin listserve Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy I'm trying to get SAProxy working. According to the docs, I should point my OE at 127.0.0.1, and then change my account to "account_name:server". After I do this, I'm getting authentication f

RE: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-06 Thread Jack Gostl
tl > > Cc: SpamAssassin listserve > > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to get SAProxy working. According to the docs, I > > should point > > > my OE at 127.0.0.1, and then change my account to > > >

RE: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-06 Thread Chris Santerre
e > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy > > > > > > I'm trying to get SAProxy working. According to the docs, I > should point > > my OE at 127.0.0.1, and then change my account to > > "account_name:server". After I do this, I'm getting authenticatio

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-05 Thread Dan McDonald
Jack Gostl writes: > I'm trying to get SAProxy working. According to the docs, I should > point my OE at 127.0.0.1, and then change my account to > "account_name:server". After I do this, I'm getting authentication > failures. I looked in my server log, and did some traces and I find > that the ac

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-05 Thread Jack Gostl
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Dan McDonald wrote: > Jack Gostl writes: > > > I'm trying to get SAProxy working. According to the docs, I should > > point my OE at 127.0.0.1, and then change my account to > > "account_name:server". After I do this, I'm getting authentication > > failures. I looked in my ser

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-05 Thread Jack Gostl
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Simon Byrnand wrote: > > > > I'm trying to get SAProxy working. According to the docs, I should point > > my OE at 127.0.0.1, and then change my account to > > "account_name:server". After I do this, I'm getting authentication > > failures. I looked in my server log, and did so

Re: [SAtalk] SAproxy

2003-06-05 Thread Simon Byrnand
> > I'm trying to get SAProxy working. According to the docs, I should point > my OE at 127.0.0.1, and then change my account to > "account_name:server". After I do this, I'm getting authentication > failures. I looked in my server log, and did some traces and I find that > the account is begin sub