RE: [SAtalk] Generating Statistics (new graph enclosed)

2002-10-29 Thread Jeremy Turner
> -Original Message- > From: Mike Loiterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > I get this error when I run your script: > Fatal error: Call to undefined function: imagecreate() in > /usr/home/mike/phplot-4.4.6/phplot.php on line 203 > > I did some checking and it appears that the problem is be

RE: [SAtalk] Generating Statistics (new graph enclosed)

2002-10-29 Thread Mike Loiterman
> -Original Message- > From: Jeremy Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 3:35 PM > To: Rich Wellner; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Generating Statistics (new graph enclosed) > > On Thu, 2002-10-2

RE: [SAtalk] Generating Statistics (new graph enclosed)

2002-10-29 Thread Chris Santerre
WOW! That is slick and easy. Nice work. -Original Message- From: Jeremy Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:35 PM To: Rich Wellner; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Generating Statistics (new graph enclosed) On Thu, 2002-10

Re: [SAtalk] Generating Statistics (new graph enclosed)

2002-10-29 Thread Jeremy Turner
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 14:36, Rich Wellner wrote: > I was writing this note and put in that a histogram might be useful and that a > couple people had already asked, so I decided to put one together instead of > continuing to talk about it. > > You can see a sample from my mail: http://wellner.org/

RE: [SAtalk] Generating Statistics (new graph enclosed)

2002-10-24 Thread Michael Moncur
> Yeah, that's my personal mail. That's what happens when your a > consultant for > 13 years, run two fairly popular web sites and refuse to disable circa '92 > email addresses because, you never know, someone you have lost > track of might > have a gig for you. You see why SA was so appealing to

Re: [SAtalk] Generating Statistics (new graph enclosed)

2002-10-24 Thread Rich Wellner
"Mike Loiterman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I understand now. Well, is there anyway to fix it so that the graph is > actually useful when you reach those kind of numbers? Mine works great and > is very useful, but I probably have a 1/100 of the volume you do. BTW, is > that your personal mai