RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

2003-12-10 Thread David B Funk
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Thomas Shoaf (PromoStep) wrote: > > The answer to your question, Gary... We are an incentives marketing firm > with an affiliate element. Our members can send virtual promotions from > their account to friends, family, colleagues, etc; however, some email > services such as Ho

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

2003-12-10 Thread David B Funk
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Thomas Shoaf (PromoStep) wrote: > As for correcting the items listed in my original post, I am looking for an > example of the correct content that should be included in the content of the > HTML message relating to such items appearing in the Content Analysis when > checked th

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

2003-12-09 Thread Gary Funck
Interesting mail header on this message: Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from intrepid.intrepid.com (intrepid.intrepid.com [192.195.190.1]) by screamer.intrepid.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hB9H4rhE029668 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:04:53 -0800 Rece

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

2003-12-09 Thread Gary Smith
OTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:43 AM To: Gary Smith; 'Matt Kettler'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis The answer to your question, Gary... We are an incentives marketing firm with an affiliate element. Our members can send virtual promo

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

2003-12-09 Thread Ernest W. Lessenger
At 09:55 AM 12/9/2003, you wrote: --On Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:33 PM -0500 "Thomas Shoaf (PromoStep)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking more of a web-based utility that our staff can use internally > where most of our staff does not have access to the server, much less > command-line

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

2003-12-09 Thread Evan Platt
--On Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:33 PM -0500 "Thomas Shoaf (PromoStep)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking more of a web-based utility that our staff can use internally > where most of our staff does not have access to the server, much less > command-line access. Which would be useless,

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

2003-12-09 Thread Thomas Shoaf \(PromoStep\)
Gary Smith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Kettler Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Content Analysis At 12:01 PM 12/9/2003, Thomas Shoaf \(PromoStep\) wrote:

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

2003-12-09 Thread Gary Smith
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Kettler Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [SAtalk] Content Analysis At 12:01 PM 12/9/2003, Thomas Shoaf \(PromoStep\) wrote: >1) I have used the Cont

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

2003-12-09 Thread Thomas Shoaf \(PromoStep\)
] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Content Analysis At 12:01 PM 12/9/2003, Thomas Shoaf \(PromoStep\) wrote: >1) I have used the Content Checker over at Lyris - Is there such a >Content Checker available that I may use on my respective server that >allows me to checked my content before sending i

Re: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

2003-12-09 Thread Matt Kettler
At 12:01 PM 12/9/2003, Thomas Shoaf \(PromoStep\) wrote: 1) I have used the Content Checker over at Lyris - Is there such a Content Checker available that I may use on my respective server that allows me to checked my content before sending it out via email, etc. I like the tool at Lyris BUT I