> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Leghart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:03 PM
> To: Chris Santerre
> Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] (OT) DSL/DIALUP manual BL Catch 22
>
>
> --On Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9
--On Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:56 AM -0400 Chris Santerre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for your access file Pat!! Your list was great help. I wanted to
let you know how I'm handling this as it may be of some help.
Some quick info:
The access file you sent me with blocked IPs had some class
If you've got the connection with the intention of running your own
mailserver, check the IP address(es) you've got on an RBL lookup page
such as:
Fortunately, I'm not on any of the RBL lists. I don't have enough
customers to spam! ;)
The problem thing is that my IP block was still a "DSL IP
At 08:26 15/07/03 -0700, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
I'm using a DSL line on my email server. Which is part of my ISP's static
DSL pool. I don't send thru my ISP's mail server. I'm starting to see the
error in this now. In my mind I had somehow split the difference of HOME
DSL and BUSINESS DSL. I al
> -Original Message-
> From: Pat Masterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] (OT) DSL/DIALUP manual BL Catch 22
>
>
> Here it is Chris..
> GL. -pat
>
Thanks for your access file Pat!! Your list was great help. I wanted to let
you know how I
lk (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] (OT) DSL/DIALUP manual BL Catch 22
| On Jul 15, 2003 at 14:48, Raul Dias wrote:
|
| >You are already paying a ISP, so, use its services.
| >The ISP should relay your emails for you and q
On Jul 15, 2003 at 14:48, Raul Dias wrote:
>You are already paying a ISP, so, use its services.
>The ISP should relay your emails for you and queue incoming mail.
Personally, I prefer my ISP to give me an IP connection. A fast
one, static address highly preferred. That's all.
>Of course not all
Just my ¢2,
Em Ter, 2003-07-15 às 11:20, Chris Santerre escreveu:
> I'm using a DSL line on my email server. Which is part of my ISP's
> static DSL pool. I don't send thru my ISP's mail server. I'm starting
> to see the error in this now. In my mind I had somehow split the
> difference of HOME D
-Original Message-
> From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:37 AM
> To: Chris Santerre
> Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] (OT) DSL/DIALUP manual BL Catch 22
>
>
> Hi,
>
> My list does exactly tha
Hi,
My list does exactly that... but... I am very selective about what
ISP's get the dialup/dsl block.
rr.com, sympatico.ca, earthlink.net doesn't, the just get /32 blocks
.br,.kr,.cn,.mx, btopenworld, ono.com, .ar, .jp, and hongkong do get
full /24 or greater blocks.
I just base this on the
I'm using a DSL line on my email server. Which is part of my ISP's
static DSL pool. I don't send thru my ISP's mail server. I'm starting to
see the error in this now. In my mind I had somehow split the difference
of HOME DSL and BUSINESS DSL. I always agreed that HOME DSL users should
always se
| I'm using a DSL line on my email server. Which is part of my ISP's static
| DSL pool. I don't send thru my ISP's mail server. I'm starting to see the
| error in this now. In my mind I had somehow split the difference of HOME DSL
| and BUSINESS DSL. I always agreed that HOME DSL users should alway
12 matches
Mail list logo