Re: OT: RE: [SAtalk] Only 1.3 score by spamassassin

2003-07-02 Thread Daniel Quinlan
"Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What I dont understand is why you guys dont just pass html messages > thru the rendering core of Mozilla and extract the text as the > viewer would see. This would eliminate all the attempts to obscure > the message. And any message with screwed up text after

Re: OT: RE: [SAtalk] Only 1.3 score by spamassassin

2003-07-02 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Bill wrote: > What I dont understand is why you guys dont just pass html messages thru > the rendering core of Mozilla Possibly because Mozilla isn't written in Perl? Possibly because SA already has its own HTML renderer through which the messages are passed? > and extract t

OT: RE: [SAtalk] Only 1.3 score by spamassassin

2003-07-02 Thread Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Only 1.3 score by spamassassin > > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 10:42:00AM +0300, Jan Elmqvist Nielsen wrote: > >> How did this mail only get 1.3 by spamassassin? >> >> I am using mailscanner 4.21-9 and spamassassin 2.55 > > Are you letting MailSca