Re: [SAtalk] whitelist vs. mime_defang

2002-06-27 Thread Olivier Nicole
Hi, > shows that whitelist is applied, bumping the score down to change > is as non-spam-status. But it is still getting mangled by > mime_defang to a somewhat-unreadable form (straight HTML code). I am not sure mime-defang option applies to spam only, I think that is a general option that SA ap

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist vs. mime_defang

2002-06-27 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Kevin G. J. Freels wrote: > The whitelist_to section of the doc: > > whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > If the given address appears in the `To:' or `Cc:' > headers, mail will be whitelisted. > > As I read this, it says that the whitelist_from is for exte

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist vs. mime_defang

2002-06-27 Thread Kevin G. J. Freels
No, this is mail from outside to a user inside; it's not mail we're sending out. Accordning to the SA Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.txt docs: whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Used to specify addresses which send mail that is often tagged (incorrectly) as spam; The whitelist_to section

[SAtalk] whitelist vs. mime_defang

2002-06-27 Thread Kevin G. J. Freels
Quick question, I haven't seen any answer to this on the list or in the docs I have set mime_defang (actually, set by default, I believe) in the local.cf to disarm viruii, but this buggers up any HTML-based email, even legitimate stuff. So I started to add the sites (like Amazon, Travelocity,