RE: [SAtalk] spamd problems

2003-11-18 Thread Todd Schuldt
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Constable Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 4:10 AM To: spamassassin Mailing List (E-mail) Subject: [SAtalk] spamd problems Hi all, I had a fully functioning system running SpamAssassin(daemon) 2.55 Antivir 2.66 Exim 4.12 all on top of SuSE 8.2. Having

[SAtalk] spamd problems

2003-11-18 Thread Paul Constable
Hi all, I had a fully functioning system running SpamAssassin(daemon) 2.55 Antivir 2.66 Exim 4.12 all on top of SuSE 8.2. Having many ppieces on SpamAssassin I picked up on the fact that it was good advice to upgrade and keep apace of the progress being made. So I dutifu

RE: [SAtalk] Spamd problems with big loads

2003-10-09 Thread Steve Halligan
> I'm using SA 2.6 spamd/spamc > > I'm using it in a very loaded server, I get arround 2 mail connections > per second. > I want to know if there are people having this kind of load, or even > bigger, cause I don't think this should be a big load for the server. > > The server is Pentium III 1 g

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd problems with big loads

2003-10-08 Thread Robert A. Hayden
I dunno. I've had mine turned off forever and I've had ZERO FNs since upgrading to 2.60 and dumping about 200 messages through sa-learn. On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Brian Morrison wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:45:54 -0500 (CDT) in > [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Robert A. > Hayden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd problems with big loads

2003-10-08 Thread Brian Morrison
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:45:54 -0500 (CDT) in [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Robert A. Hayden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A few things I can recommend that speed things up: > > 1) Turn off RBL lookups How much additional spam did you want to have to look at? -- Brian Morrison bdm at fenrir dot org dot u

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd problems with big loads

2003-10-08 Thread Fred I-IS.COM
We are receiving near this much mail traffic, I get about 1 connection every 2 seconds, average of 50k messages per day. I am using spamD on 3 different servers to spread the load around, it's working great! In am also running my own creation (WinSpamC) which allows for load-balancing between mul

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd problems with big loads

2003-10-08 Thread Robert A. Hayden
I am running 2.6 on a P4-2.4GHz that gets about 1/3 that amount of traffic and most of my analyses are completed in under .25 seconds. The box is running RH9.0 and using postfix to call procmail. A few things I can recommend that speed things up: 1) Turn off RBL lookups 2) Run a local cachin

[SAtalk] Spamd problems with big loads

2003-10-08 Thread Diego Weinstein
I'm using SA 2.6 spamd/spamc I'm using it in a very loaded server, I get arround 2 mail connections per second. I want to know if there are people having this kind of load, or even bigger, cause I don't think this should be a big load for the server. The server is Pentium III 1 ghz, 512 MB ram.

[SAtalk] spamd problems.

2002-06-05 Thread Doug Dempsey
I keep getting an error message when I start spamd. Two pids show. One remains constant and the other changes about every two seconds. Also, I keep getting a Kwrited screen that stays in the foreground. It keeps writing lowercase s on a single line without wrapping. If I stop the spamd, the kwrit

Re: [SAtalk] spamd problems

2002-01-27 Thread Craig Hughes
Those error messages seem to be saying that spamd is already running and bound to the port.  Rebooting presumably killed the running processes. C On Sun, 2002-01-27 at 11:07, Robert Dege wrote: Nevermind, I just needed to reboot the server, and now all is well. I'm not sure why it d

Re: [SAtalk] spamd problems

2002-01-27 Thread Robert Dege
Nevermind, I just needed to reboot the server, and now all is well. I'm not sure why it did that, but unless it happens again, I'm not going to worry about it. -Rob > Okay, I'm having some problems getting spamd to run. > > As root, when I execute: > > # spamd > > I get the following error:

[SAtalk] spamd problems

2002-01-27 Thread Robert Dege
Okay, I'm having some problems getting spamd to run. As root, when I execute: # spamd I get the following error: bind: Address already in use at /usr/bin/spamd line 143' Upon investigation, my $addr is not getting a value when it does gethostbyname($opt_i || '127.0.0.1'); (even if I specify a