[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(1) From: Tail Wagging Offers News Letter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Score: 5
X-Spam-Level: * (5)
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www.roaringpenguin.com/mimedefang)
My spam threshold is set to 1.5. This email should have been flagged
Luiz,
(B
(BOn 2003$BG/(B July$B7n(B 31$BF|(B Thursday, at 11:01 AM, Luiz L Souza wrote:
(B
(B> Thanks for the prompt reply.
(B> Here are two examples of spamassassin info from emails I received:
(B>
(B> (1) From: Tail Wagging Offers News Letter
(B> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(B> X-Sp
Hmm.. I'm not really familiar with mimedefang, and the output it's put
there isn't very informative.
My first question would be how did you set your spam threshold to 1.5? What
exact configuration file and command did you use?
My next question would be can you generate a X-Spam-Status header,
PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spam flag NO despite high score
> At 11:01 AM 7/30/2003 -0400, Luiz L Souza wrote:
> >My mail provider uses spamassassin. I have set the spam threshold
> >to a low value, 1.5, and added
At 11:01 AM 7/30/2003 -0400, Luiz L Souza wrote:
My mail provider uses spamassassin. I have set the spam threshold
to a low value, 1.5, and added some entries to my 'allow' and
'deny' lists in order to reduce the number of spam that gets through
spamassassin. Most of the spam is correctly identif
My mail provider uses spamassassin. I have
set the spam threshold
to a low value, 1.5, and added some entries to my
'allow' and
'deny' lists in order to reduce the number of spam
that gets through
spamassassin. Most of the spam is correctly
identified. The problem
is that some emails are f
