On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 08:54:35AM -0400, Charles wrote:
> From: "Pamela lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 11, Jun 2003 22:11:37 +
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Assistance
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain
> X-Spam-Index: 1055362464
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.9 required=
> Sorry, what's the purpose of that?
>
>
> Kai
Probably to let us all know that SpamAssasin works just fine :-)
Other than that, I'm not sure *grins*
Benjamin
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
Great deals on office technology --
Sorry, what's the purpose of that?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
G
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailgate0.sover.net (mailgate0.sover.net [209.198.87.43])
by mailhub0.sover.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5BKE8v22907
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:14:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hermes.vtweb.com (hermes.vtweb.COM [216.66.111.4
Theo Van Dinter wrote on Sat, 31 May 2003 15:56:26 -0400:
> http://www.kluge.net/~felicity/random/handlespam.txt
>
Thanks, I found it and the other scripts in that directory.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center:
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 10:52:56AM +0100, Chris Evans wrote:
> to something like:
> my $fromAddr = [EMAIL PROTECTED];# what address for reporting
>
> Crude but would probably work for me.
That's the message header From, not the envelope From. Completely different.
> could be added to the bl
On Saturday, May 31, 2003, 9:05:35 PM Theo wrote:
TVD> That's going to be the envelope sender. handlespam just calls sendmail,
TVD> and unless told otherwise (via -f [EMAIL PROTECTED]), it'll figure out
TVD> the from using your username and domain.
Or just change the line:
my $fromAddr = $ENV{'L
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 11:49:05PM +0100, Jim Ford wrote:
> reports (to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) are getting bounced with the error 'Domain of
> sender address does not exist', with my own local 'domain' and login name
> quoted. I suspect this is a sendmail issue and as I don't have a clue how to
> fix i
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 05:31:32PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> can you give a URL? I must have overlooked it getting mentioned anywhere.
I usually mention it on the list occasionally.
http://www.kluge.net/~felicity/random/handlespam.txt
Basically it'll take an mbox file and run each message thr
Jim Ford wrote on Thu, 29 May 2003 23:49:05 +0100:
> Theo Van Dinter's Handlespam
>
can you give a URL? I must have overlooked it getting mentioned anywhere.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & h
Hi,
Instead of simply dumping spam, I'm now trying to be a bit more proactive
and report it to 'Vipul's Razor et al', using my folder of spam missed by
spamassasin and Theo Van Dinter's Handlespam.
I don't use real domains addresses on my home machines and whilst I've
changed the Handlespam scrip
Jim Scott wrote:
JS> 1. Since I am now using spamassassin and it is now putting all the messages
JS> tagged as spam in a folder called caught spam. How can I then use the
JS> spamassassin -r to report all messages in that mbox file? I assume that if I
JS> use spamassassin -r < caughtspam it will
1. Since I am now using spamassassin and it is now putting all the messages
tagged as spam in a folder called caught spam. How can I then use the
spamassassin -r to report all messages in that mbox file? I assume that if I
use spamassassin -r < caughtspam it will report it all as one big message?
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:31:00PM -0600, dman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 04:25:42AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> | [please keep cc'ing me on replies]
> |
> | also sprach Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.03.26.2358 +0100]:
> | > Report a Debian bug or a bugzilla bug (http://bugzi
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 04:25:42AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
| [please keep cc'ing me on replies]
|
| also sprach Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.03.26.2358 +0100]:
| > Report a Debian bug or a bugzilla bug (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org),
| > and I'll definitely look into it. Ple
[please keep cc'ing me on replies]
also sprach Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.03.26.2358 +0100]:
> Report a Debian bug or a bugzilla bug (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org),
> and I'll definitely look into it. Please be sure to include the version of
> Razor you are using.
yeeehaa, razo
Report a Debian bug or a bugzilla bug (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org),
and I'll definitely look into it. Please be sure to include the version of
Razor you are using.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 12:59:41PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> to test this, i saved two spam messages, one with spamassass
hi all,
first off, please CC me on replies since i am not subscribed
currently.
since a recent update of my Debian Woody system, which is now using
spamassassin 2.11, the -r spam reporting does not seem to work
anymore.
to test this, i saved two spam messages, one with spamassassin reports
and
dman said:
> Do you want the SA tags stripped first?
> IOW, should I use
>
> "spamassassin -d | /usr/sbin/exim SpamAssassin-sightings@lists.
> sf.net"
this is best, FWIW.
--j.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourc
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 03:36:06PM +1100, Justin Mason wrote:
|
| Daniel Pittman said:
|
| > Hi. I noticed on the website for SpamAssassin, which is a very nice
| > tool, that there is a mailing list for SPAM that was not caught to be
| > sent to for analysis.
| > What I am not sure of is how,
> ''bounce'' or ''redistribute'' it, as forwards are very hard to
> de-forward-ize -- the format is different for each MUA :(
Wouldn't it be easy to set up something that would process mail that is
forwarded as a MIME attachment? That preserves the headers even better
than bouncing and is someth
Daniel Pittman said:
> Hi. I noticed on the website for SpamAssassin, which is a very nice
> tool, that there is a mailing list for SPAM that was not caught to be
> sent to for analysis.
> What I am not sure of is how, exactly, I should be forwarding this mail.
''bounce'' or ''redistribute'' i
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 10:44:38AM +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> What I am not sure of is how, exactly, I should be forwarding this mail.
>
> Do I send it as an RFC 822 attachment or what?
I subscribed to the list for about 2 hours, figuring that it would be about
heuristics to better find like
Hi. I noticed on the website for SpamAssassin, which is a very nice
tool, that there is a mailing list for SPAM that was not caught to be
sent to for analysis.
What I am not sure of is how, exactly, I should be forwarding this mail.
Do I send it as an RFC 822 attachment or what?
Maybe improvin
On Sat, 2002-01-26 at 21:01, Gene Ruebsamen wrote:
> The users on my mail server are accessing their e-mail remotely via IMAP
> or POP3 using an MUA such as Evolution or Outlook. Now, has anyone
> figured out a way to report spam via a remote MUA? It would involve
> running spammassasin -r remot
The users on my mail server are accessing their e-mail remotely via IMAP or POP3 using an MUA such as Evolution or Outlook. Now, has anyone figured out a way to report spam via a remote MUA? It would involve running spammassasin -r remotely. Has there been any work in this area? It would be
26 matches
Mail list logo
